Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Phillips, 430 P.2d 139.

80 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. hon.gordon/owen Ariz. 2025
201; see also, (confirming that courts may take judicial notice of a geographic fact).
State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Raymond John 308 P.3d 1208 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
(court may take judicial notice of geographic facts).
State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
State v. Detrich 873 P.2d 1302 Ariz. 1994
State v. Boldrey 861 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Boldrey 861 P.2d 663 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Phillips, , , vacated in part on other grounds
State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. McCuin 808 P.2d 332 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(defendant was properly convicted of raping and molesting his daughter when acts of rape and child molestation were separate, with the elements of each being accomplished without reference to elements of the other); P.2d 139 (1967) (offense of fellatio found distinctly separate from act of child molesting, so that defendant charged with lewd and lascivious acts and also with child molestation by placing his finger into private parts of an 8-year-old girl committing fellatio upon him was not bein
State v. Carter 601 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1979
State v. Carter 601 P.2d 287 Ariz. 1979
State v. Dishong 594 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1979
State v. Dishong 594 P.2d 84 Ariz. 1979
State v. Pickett 589 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1978
State v. Pickett 589 P.2d 16 Ariz. 1978
170 , 50 L.Ed.2d 143 (1976)
State v. Pittman 574 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1978
State v. Pittman 574 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1978
State v. O'NEILL 572 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1977
State v. O'NEILL 572 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1977
State v. Maxwell 570 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Maxwell 570 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Wallen 560 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Wallen 560 P.2d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Torres 556 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Torres 556 P.2d 1159 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Schlenker 549 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Schlenker 549 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
appellant claims that at most the evidence shows he was guilty of fellatio and therefore should have been charged with the violation of A.R.S.
State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 270 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
and that an eleven year old conviction was valid for impeachment purposes, King, supra.
State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
P.2d 139 (1967); , State v. Babineaux, 22 Ariz.App.
State v. Finn 528 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1974
State v. Finn 528 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1974
State v. Kelly, Ariz., ; , State v. Jacobs, 18 Ariz.App.
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Kelly 526 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1974
State v. Kelly 526 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. McFarlin 517 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1973
State v. McFarlin 517 P.2d 87 Ariz. 1973
In 1967 , , this Court again upheld the admission of other acts of sexual misconduct to be shown in a prosecution for fellatio.
State v. Rice 516 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rice 516 P.2d 1222 Ariz. 1973
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. Hutton 509 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1973
State v. Hutton 509 P.2d 626 Ariz. 1973
325 , 30 L.Ed.2d 274 (1971)