Cited by

(listing the various factors trial courts should consider when deciding whether to award attorney’s fees).

The court cited to McDowell Mountain Ranch for the proposition that “implicit in any contractual provision for attorneys’ fees is a standard of reasonableness even if the contract provides for all attorneys’ fees,”

(“[T]he trial court should consider whether the award in any particular case would discourage other parties with tenable claims or defenses from litigating or defending legitimate contract issues for fear of incurring liability for substantial amounts of attorney’s fees.”).

7 do not weigh in favor of an award of fees or that the hours or billable rates of Alan’s counsel were unreasonable.

–71 (1985) ( (“[T]he question is not whether the judges of this court would have made an original like ruling, but whether a judicial mind, in view of the law and circumstances, could have made the ruling without exceeding the bounds of reason.

(“We cannot substitute our discretion for that of the trial judge.” ( (Windes, J., specially concurring))).

when determining whether to award attorneys’ fees in a quiet title action under § 12-1103(B)); (noting that 4 COOK v. GREBE, et al. Opinion of the Court § 12-1103(

the supreme court listed several factors a court should consider 6 BOTTO v. BOTTO Decision of the Court ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS ON APPEAL ¶17 Both parties request an award of attorn

( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).

on other grounds, Nationwide Mut.

AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: AA 7 Ms. Webb sought $221,391 in fees; the court awarded her $181,232

( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).