Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner, 694 P.2d 1181.

400 citing documents.

Tasha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 396 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2017
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 396 P.3d 600 Ariz. 2017
-71 , -85 (1985) (listing nonexclusive factors bearing on attorney fee awards under § 12-341.01); A.R.S.
Maxted v. Tws Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Maxted v. Tws Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Bobrow v. Bobrow 391 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Bobrow v. Bobrow 391 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(listing factors superior court should consider in determining whether attorney’s fees should be granted under A.R.S.
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Arik v. Rgo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amberwood v. Swann's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amberwood v. Swann's Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(stating that § 12-341.01(A) does not require an award of fees to the prevailing party); (same).
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Petrovich v. Branciforte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Petrovich v. Branciforte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Klesla v. Wittenberg 380 P.3d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Klesla v. Wittenberg 380 P.3d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Silverwood v. Kush Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stern v. Stern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stern v. Stern Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Copper State v. Espiritu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Copper State v. Espiritu Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
5 PHOENIX v. GLENAYRE, et al. Opinion of the Court (1985), awarded attorneys’ fees pursuant to A.R.S.
Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶45 Silver Point argues the trial court should not have awarded any attorneys’ 8 Silver Point first argues the trial court should not have awarded fees because Silver Point supported its positions with “published [Arizona] Supreme Court authority,” namely, Helme.
Shoemake v. Estancia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Shoemake v. Estancia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
(Windes, J., specially concurring).
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
( (Windes, J., specially concurring)).
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Eick v. Delta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶8 the court determined Eick was not entitled to a fee award under A.R.S.
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp. v. Warner (Warner II), - 71 (1985) (noting that, in review of a decision to grant or deny attorneys’ fees, courts should ask “whether a judicial mind, in view of the law and circumstances, could have made the ruling without exceeding the bounds of reason”) ( (Windes, J., specially concurri
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Johnson v. Swing Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Az Eufora v. Constantine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Az Eufora v. Constantine Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Krenzen v. Katz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by