Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner, 694 P.2d 1181.

400 citing documents.

Russell v. Royal MacCabees Life Insurance 974 P.2d 443 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Hale v. Amphitheater School District No. 10 961 P.2d 1059 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Attorney’s Fees ¶20 Hale challenges the trial court’s award of $4,500 in attorney’s fees to the District (less than half the amount it sought)
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(citing *284 , for factor number seven).
Krizanich v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 887 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Krizanich v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance 887 P.2d 989 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lindsey 885 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
(denying prevailing insurer’s request for fees was not an abuse of discretion considering “the nature of action and relative economic positions of the parties”); , (denying fees to insurer who had summary
Reisch v. M & D TERMINALS, INC. 884 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Reisch v. M & D TERMINALS, INC. 884 P.2d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
and Great Western Bank & Trust Co. v. Pima Sav.
All-Way Leasing, Inc. v. Kelly 895 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
All-Way Leasing, Inc. v. Kelly 895 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Trantor v. Fredrikson 878 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1994
Trantor v. Fredrikson 878 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1994
which related to § 12-341.01(A), this court held in Richey that specific findings of fact and conclusions of law were required.
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co. 876 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Wildwood Hills Mobile Home Park v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire Safety 885 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Wildwood Hills Mobile Home Park v. Arizona Department of Building & Fire Safety 885 P.2d 131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
*450 , our supreme court held that the language of AR.S.
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Sanborn v. Brooker & Wake Property Management, Inc. 874 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Appellants, however, contend that the standard for determining who is a , , and ask us to overturn the award on the basis of that standard.
Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 876 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. 876 P.2d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
in making its decision to award fees.
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 868 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co. 868 P.2d 1014 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta 880 P.2d 1109 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc. 856 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kennedy v. Linda Brock Automotive Plaza, Inc. 856 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
or that the claim upon which the award is based did not “arise out of contract” within the meaning of the statute.
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 868 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kadish v. Arizona State Land Department 868 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
v. Warner, , Great Western Bank and Trust Co. v. Pima Sav.
Mullins v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 851 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Mullins v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 851 P.2d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Grand v. Cigna Property & Casualty Co. 837 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Grand v. Cigna Property & Casualty Co. 837 P.2d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Johns v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 817 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Johns v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 817 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
ATTORNEY’S FEES The superior court stated in its minute entry denying Johns’ request for attorney’s , , (App.1983), modified
Cox Arizona Publications, Inc. v. Collins 818 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Cox Arizona Publications, Inc. v. Collins 818 P.2d 174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Cambridge Co. v. Arizona Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. 801 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Cambridge Co. v. Arizona Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. 801 P.2d 504 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
CROSS-APPEAL Cambridge complains on cross-appeal that the trial court denied it attorney’s fees, , and had shown their applicability in this case.
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Ayres v. Red Cloud Mills, Ltd. 808 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
St. Paul Property & Liability Insurance v. Eymann 802 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Woerth v. City of Flagstaff 808 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by