Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner, 694 P.2d 1181.
- Woerth v. City of Flagstaff 808 P.2d 297 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Rohde v. Beztak of Arizona, Inc. 793 P.2d 140 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
-
Rohde v. Beztak of Arizona, Inc.
793 P.2d 140
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
the Rohdes argue that the trial court abused its discretion in applying the factors listed *389 in that case.
- Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27 799 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
-
Britt v. Red Mesa Unified School District No. 27
799 P.2d 9
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
and find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in the award.
- Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 798 P.2d 1343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
-
Chavarria v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
798 P.2d 1343
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Sparks, 132 Ariz. at 545 , 647 P.2d at 1143 .
- Croci v. Travelers Insurance 788 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1990
- Croci v. Travelers Insurance 788 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1990
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Doe 788 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. Doe 788 P.2d 121 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
- Croci v. Travelers Insurance 781 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
Croci v. Travelers Insurance
781 P.2d 1010
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
quoting Jones v. Queen Ins.
- State v. Richey 774 P.2d 1354 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Richey
774 P.2d 1354
Ariz. 1989
(“Although [§ 12-341.01(4) ] does not require it, ...
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services 775 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1989
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health Services 775 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1989
- Asphalt Engineers, Inc. v. Galusha 770 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Asphalt Engineers, Inc. v. Galusha 770 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace 763 P.2d 545 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
Bar J Bar Cattle Co., Inc. v. Pace
763 P.2d 545
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
the appellee makes no convincing showing that the court abused its discretion.
- London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- London v. Green Acres Trust 765 P.2d 538 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. v. City of Tempe 756 P.2d 929 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
-
Emergency Medical Transport, Inc. v. City of Tempe
756 P.2d 929
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
ATTORNEY’S FEES The trial court denied Southwest’s request for attorney’s fees, stating: [ ] (1985), and concludes that a fee award would be inappropriate in this case.
- Harris v. Reserve Life Insurance 762 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Harris v. Reserve Life Insurance 762 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
- Williams v. Tucson Unified School District No. 1 760 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Williams v. Tucson Unified School District No. 1 760 P.2d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Pettay v. Insurance Marketing Services, Inc. 752 P.2d 18 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical Examiners 745 P.2d 617 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Main I Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Capital Construction & Development Corp. 741 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
Main I Ltd. Partnership v. Venture Capital Construction & Development Corp.
741 P.2d 1234
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the Arizona Supreme Court listed various factors for the trial court to consider in determining whether to award attorneys’ fees pursuant to that statute.
- Wilcox v. Waldman 744 P.2d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
Wilcox v. Waldman
744 P.2d 444
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the Arizona Supreme Court listed several factors to assist trial courts in determining whether attorney’s fees should be awarded under A.R.S.
- McKesson Chemical Co. v. Van Waters & Rogers 739 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- McKesson Chemical Co. v. Van Waters & Rogers 739 P.2d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- Janis v. Spelts 739 P.2d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
-
Janis v. Spelts
739 P.2d 814
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
makes it clear that the trial judge has broad discretion in deciding whether to grant attorney’s fees under that statute.
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler 738 P.2d 1134 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
-
State Farm Automobile Insurance v. Dressler
738 P.2d 1134
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
and that they themselves were involved in the litigation only because they were injured by State Farm’s insured.
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Wheeler v. Yuma School District No. One 750 P.2d 857 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co. 733 P.2d 652 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986