Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for Magma Copper Co., 692 P.2d 280.

129 citing documents.

Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
1954 , 95 L.Ed.2d 527 (1987); Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital, Magma Copper, , , Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Schoenfelder v. Arizona Bank 796 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1990
Schoenfelder v. Arizona Bank 796 P.2d 881 Ariz. 1990
n our discretion, suspended it when an issue was raised in the trial court but not in the court of appeals, or when the case involved “issues of statewide importance, those of constitutional dimension or situations in which the public interest is better served by having the issue considered rather than deferred.” Dombey, 150 Ariz. at 482 , 724 P.2d at 568 , , Ruth v. Industrial Comm’n, -74 , -30 (1971).
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 788 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Carrow Co. v. Lusby 788 P.2d 1201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
for Magma Copper Company, , Ruth v. Indus.
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
City of Tucson v. Fahringer 781 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Bryant v. Continental Conveyor & Equipment Co. 751 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior Court 742 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Humana Hospital Desert Valley v. Superior Court 742 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
the court discussed the distinction between abrogation and regulation: The legislature may regulate the cause of action for negligence so long as it leaves a claimant reasonable alternatives or choices which will enable him or her to bring the action.
Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance 733 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1987
Hawkins v. Allstate Insurance 733 P.2d 1073 Ariz. 1987
Estrada v. Arizona Bank 732 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Estrada v. Arizona Bank 732 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 186 Ariz. 1986
79-81 n. 9, , 971-73 n. 9 (1984); see also Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital, Magma Copper
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 724 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1986
Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 724 P.2d 562 Ariz. 1986
Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & Handicapped 721 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & Handicapped 721 P.2d 1177 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
the Arizona Supreme Court held that the personal injury action of an injured minor is tolled by A.R.S.
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
Alvarado v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona 716 P.2d 18 Ariz. 1986
74 n. 3, , 966 n. 3 (1984)
Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1985
Anderson v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA 711 P.2d 595 Ariz. 1985
Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 718 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 718 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
uries shall never be abrogated, and the amount recovered shall not be subject to any statutory limitation.” Article 2, § 31 also protects the right to sue for damages, “No law shall be enacted in this State limiting the amount of damages to be recovered for causing the death or injury of any person.”
Lucchesi v. Frederic N. Stimmell, M.D., Ltd. 716 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Boswell v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 730 P.2d 178 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
the court held that a statute of limitations which effectively abrogates a damage action is invalid under the constitution.