Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School District, 687 P.2d 354.

72 citing documents.

Wallace v. Irving Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Wallace v. Irving Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Dist., (explaining the court of appeals does not substitute its judgment for the trial court’s in not awarding attorney fees).
Mark Gilmore v. Kate Gallego 552 P.3d 1084 Ariz. 2024
Mark Gilmore v. Kate Gallego 552 P.3d 1084 Ariz. 2024
¶25 This Court first confronted a
Neptune Swimming Foundation v. City of Scottsdale Ariz. 2024
Neptune Swimming Foundation v. City of Scottsdale Ariz. 2024
Neptune v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Neptune v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Darcie Schires v. Cathy Carlat 480 P.3d 639 Ariz. 2021
Darcie Schires v. Cathy Carlat 480 P.3d 639 Ariz. 2021
Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Stuart v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
American Federation v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
Frank Piccioli v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
Distinguished Frank Piccioli v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
which stated that courts should generally refrain from awarding fees under § 12-341.01 against citizens who sue to challenge the legitimacy of government action because it would “chill” such suits.
Distinguished American Federation v. City of Phoenix Ariz. 2020
which stated that courts should generally refrain from awarding fees under § 12-341.01 against citizens who sue to challenge the legitimacy of government action because it would “chill” such suits.
Schires v. Carlat Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Schires v. Carlat Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dist., (internal citations omitted).
Sw Fabrication v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sw Fabrication v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶28 SWF argues nonetheless that awarding attorneys’ fees in this case contravenes public policy
Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Webb v. Farm Bureau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court FILED: AA 7 Ms. Webb sought $221,391 in fees; the court awarded her $181,232
cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement Association 379 P.3d 211 Ariz. 2016
cheatham/huey v. Diciccio/phoenix Law Enforcement Association 379 P.3d 211 Ariz. 2016
Dist., , (“The constitutional prohibition was intended to prevent governmental bodies from depleting the public treasury by giving advantages to special interests])]”).
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. 375 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tessler v. Progressive Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Corp. v. Warner (Warner I), ).
cheatham/huey v. Plea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cheatham v. Diciccio 356 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Cheatham v. Diciccio 356 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
cheatham/huey v. Plea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anderson v. Prescott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dist., 4 As a result of this element and the definition of accrual in A.R.S.
State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission 229 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
State v. Arizona Navigable Stream Adjudication Commission 229 P.3d 242 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dist., , (citations omitted).
Turken v. Gordon 224 P.3d 158 Ariz. 2010
Turken v. Gordon 224 P.3d 158 Ariz. 2010
tivities of amusement, commercial property rental, hotels and motels, job printing, publishing, rental of tangible personal property, residential property rental, restaurants and bars, retail sales, and use taxes.” 6 P.2d 354 (1984).
Turken v. Gordon 207 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Turken v. Gordon 207 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Dist., , (citations omitted); see Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 1631 (2002) (“panoptic ...
Kotterman v. Killian 972 P.2d 606 Ariz. 1999
Kotterman v. Killian 972 P.2d 606 Ariz. 1999
Dist., -49 , -57 (1984) (holding that state payment of portion of teacher association president’s salary did not violate anti-gift clause).
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(citing *284 , for factor number seven).
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Id.; , (holding that the court of appeals does not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court in failing to award attorneys’ fees).
Pimalco, Inc. v. Maricopa County 937 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Pimalco, Inc. v. Maricopa County 937 P.2d 1198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Maricopa County v. State 928 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Maricopa County v. State 928 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
of Regents, -21 , -80 (1986)