Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School District, 687 P.2d 354.

72 citing documents.

Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. Hassell 837 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. Hassell 837 P.2d 158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
make any donation or grant, by subsidy or otherwise, to any individual, association, or corporation____ This provision, known as the gift clause, was adopted “to prevent governmental bodies from depleting the public treasury by giving advantages to special interests or by engaging in non-public enterprises.” , (citations omitted).
McClead v. Pima County 849 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
McClead v. Pima County 849 P.2d 1378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
City of Casa Grande v. Tucker 817 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
City of Casa Grande v. Tucker 817 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Id., 143 Ariz. at 570, 694 P.2d at 1184 ( , ).
State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 767 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State ex rel. Corbin v. Superior Court 767 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
“The public benefit to be obtained from the private entity as consideration for the payment or conveyance from a public body may constitute a ‘valuable consideration’ but the Constitution may still be violated if the value to be received by the public is far exceeded by the consideration being paid by the public.”
State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Richey 762 P.2d 585 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Cauble v. Osselaer 722 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Cauble v. Osselaer 722 P.2d 983 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Our supreme court referred to ASH, , as follows: The District claims it is entitled to attorney’s fees under A.R.S.
Burke v. Arizona State Retirement System 732 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Burke v. Arizona State Retirement System 732 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Kromko v. Arizona Board of Regents 718 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1986
Kromko v. Arizona Board of Regents 718 P.2d 478 Ariz. 1986
§ 15-1637(A) contains a provision that if the lease improvements are “conveyed to the nonprofit corporation, they shall be presumed to have been conveyed for their then fair market value (emphasis added).” Petitioner, however
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1985
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner 694 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1985
Lacer v. Navajo County 687 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Lacer v. Navajo County 687 P.2d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
in which the Supreme Court voiced its disapproval of awarding attorneys fees pursuant to A.R.S.