Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. Pearson, 703 P.2d 1197.

51 citing documents.

MARKHAM v. CAHAVA Ariz. 2026
should compensate the other.” Wang Elec., 230 Ariz. at 318 ¶ 10; see also Murdock-Bryant Constr., (“A person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution to the other.” (quoting Restatement (First) of Restitution (“Restatement”) § 1 (1937))).
Charbel v. Joyece Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Charbel v. Joyece Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Markham v. Cahava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Markham v. Cahava Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
The remedy is “not confined to any particular circumstance or set of facts,” but “is, rather, a flexible, equitable remedy available whenever the court finds that ‘the defendant, upon the circumstances of the case, is obliged by the ties of natural justice and equity’ to make compensation for benefits received.” Murdock-Bryant Constr., (citation omitted).
Bamford v. Toll Brothers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bamford v. Toll Brothers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Span v. Maricopa 437 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Span v. Maricopa 437 P.3d 881 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
(quoting Murdock-Bryant Const., ).
Levine v. Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & Mcanally, P. L.C. 418 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Levine v. Haralson, Miller, Pitt, Feldman & Mcanally, P. L.C. 418 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Murdock-Bryant Constr., Inc. v. Pearson , , 52 & n.4, , 1201 (1985) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary 1119 (5th ed. 1979) ).
Nguyen v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Nguyen v. Nguyen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wang Elec., Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, L.L.C., ¶ 10 (App. 2012) (quoting Murdock-Bryant Constr., ).8 6 Because the verified complaint and deposition testimony are sufficient to create a question of material fact, we need not address the admissibility of the email that was translated from Vietnamese to English.
Summers v. Gloor 368 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Summers v. Gloor 368 P.3d 930 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 27 , (citing Murdock-Bryant Constr., , ).
Carter Inc. v. Jade II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Carter Inc. v. Jade II Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
The underlying consideration is whether one party received a benefit at the other’s expense under “circumstances [] such that in good conscience [the first party] should make compensation.” Murdock-Bryant Constr., ( ).
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Group, LLC, ¶ 8, Murdock-Bryant Const., (citation omitted).
Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLC 283 P.3d 45 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Murdock-Bryant Constr., , ( , ).
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Freeman v. Sorchych 245 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
See Murdock-Bryant Constr., , ( , ).
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Canyon Ambulatory Surgery Center v. SCF Arizona 239 P.3d 733 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Murdock-Bryant Constr., -67 , -16 (App.1984), aff'd in relevant part by
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 163 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-64 , -13 (App. 1984), approved in part
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Dawson v. Withycombe 160 P.3d 1157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-64 , -13 (App. 1984), approved in part
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. Tierney 96 P.3d 1070 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
“ ‘Restitutionary relief is allowable only when it would be inequitable or unjust for defendant to retain the benefit without compensating plaintiff.’ ” Creative Learning Sys., , (citing Murdock-Bryant Constr., , ) (emphasis added); see also City of Sierra Vista v. Cochise Enters., Inc., , (stating that unjust enrichment occurs when a person has and retains benefits that in justice and equity belong to another).
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
ASH (claim arose out of a contract although claimant was not a party to the contract between the school district and supplier); Deutsche Credit Corp. (secured creditor’s action against innocent buyer of equipment arose out of contract between seller/debtor and creditor); Murdock-Bryant Constr., , rev’d on other grounds, , (action arose out of a contract even though parties’ express contract rescinded).
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Pelletier v. Johnson 937 P.2d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Murdock-Bryant Constr., -69 , -18 (App.1984), modified in part on other grounds, , cf. Ruck Corp., 125 Ariz. at 522 , 611 P.2d at 109 .
Creative Learning Systems, Inc. v. State 800 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Creative Learning Systems, Inc. v. State 800 P.2d 50 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
“Restitutionary relief is allowable only when it would be inequitable or unjust for defendant to retain the benefit without compensating plaintiff.” Murdock-Bryant Const.
A M Leasing, Ltd. v. Baker 786 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
A M Leasing, Ltd. v. Baker 786 P.2d 1045 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Murdock-Bryant Construction, , (
Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Radisson Group, Inc. 772 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1989
Flooring Systems, Inc. v. Radisson Group, Inc. 772 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1989
Neither party cites our decision in Murdock-Bryant Constr.
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Commercial Cornice & Millwork, Inc. v. Camel Construction Services. Corp. 739 P.2d 1351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
It is, rather, a flexible, equitable remedy available whenever the court finds that ‘the defendant, upon the circumstances of the case, is obliged by the ties of natural justice and equity’ to make compensation for benefits received.” Murdock-Bryant Construction, , citing D. Dobbs, Remedies § 4.2 at 235, quoting Moses v. MacFerlan, 2 Burr.
State v. Arizona Pension Planning 739 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1987
State v. Arizona Pension Planning 739 P.2d 1373 Ariz. 1987
See Murdock-Bryant Construction
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Blue Ridge Sewer Improvement District v. Lowry & Associates, Inc. 718 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Blue Ridge Sewer Improvement District v. Lowry & Associates, Inc. 718 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Turnkey Corp. v. Rappeport 720 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986