Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Rawlings v. Apodaca, 726 P.2d 565.
- Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 943 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
-
Voland v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
943 P.2d 808
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
In Arizona, insurance contracts include an implied covenant of “good faith and fair dealing,” whereby each party is “bound to refrain from any action which would impair the benefits which the other had the right to expect from the contract or the contractual relationship.”
- Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Lloyd v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 943 P.2d 729 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co. 919 P.2d 176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
-
Alta Vista Plaza, Ltd. v. Insulation Specialists Co.
919 P.2d 176
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
vacated in part on other grounds, , (prejudgment interest does not accrue before demand for a sum certain is made); Fairway Builders, Inc., 124 Ariz. at 264-65 , 603 P.2d at 535-36 (where no definite time for payment is stated, prejudgment interest cannot be awarded for any period prior to initial demand for payment).
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 913 P.2d 1092 Ariz. 1996
-
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
913 P.2d 1092
Ariz. 1996
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital
- Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 912 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Miel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 912 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Tucson Airport Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's 918 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Tucson Airport Authority v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's 918 P.2d 1063 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 893 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 893 P.2d 39 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn
907 P.2d 506
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Co., -57 , , 209-10 (1992); , Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins.
- Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 885 P.2d 1113 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
-
Nahom v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.
885 P.2d 1113
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Id., 172 Ariz. at 506-08 , 838 P.2d at 1267-69
- Lee v. Hodge 882 P.2d 408 Ariz. 1994
- Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
-
Hayes v. Continental Insurance
872 P.2d 668
Ariz. 1994
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982); , (compliance with industry custom is not an absolute defense to a bad faith claim).
- Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc. 883 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc.
883 P.2d 407
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
An “evil mind” may be shown by evidence that the defendant intended to injure the plaintiff or “consciously pursued a course of conduct knowing that it created a substantial risk of significant harm to others.”
- Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. 861 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
-
Fobes v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.
861 P.2d 692
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Kenelia v. Glens Falls Ins.
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
- Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
- Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Rhue v. Dawson 841 P.2d 215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 838 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1992
-
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
838 P.2d 1265
Ariz. 1992
“[T]he insurance contract and the relationship it creates contain more than the company’s bare promise to pay certain claims when forced to do so; implicit in the contract and the relationship is the insurer’s obligation to play fairly with its insured.” , (citing Parsons v. Continental Nat.
- Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co. 832 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1992
-
Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Products Co.
832 P.2d 203
Ariz. 1992
The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, stating that [ajdmittedly, it is conceivable that this set of facts could state a , and other punitive-damages cases if the defendant had a deliberate policy of discharging employees on worker’s compensation leave.
- Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc. 832 P.2d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
Hooper v. Truly Nolen of America, Inc.
832 P.2d 709
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
155 City of Glendale v. Farmers Ins.
- McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- McAlister v. Citibank 829 P.2d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
- SOUTHWEST SAV. AND LOAN v. SunAmp Systems 838 P.2d 1314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
SOUTHWEST SAV. AND LOAN v. SunAmp Systems
838 P.2d 1314
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-54 , -70 (1986): The law implies a covenant of good faith and fair dealing in every contract.
- DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. 830 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
-
DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.
830 P.2d 862
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
such damages are appropriate only where there is an intent to injure or a conscious course of conduct with knowledge that it creates a significant risk of harm to others.
- Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Walter v. Simmons
818 P.2d 214
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co., , (delay in paying benefits under contract supports bad faith claim); , (insurer’s payment of entire amount of claim does not necessarily defeat bad faith claim).
- Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 813 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Deese v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
813 P.2d 318
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
establishes that breach of contract is not an indispensable requisite to showing bad faith.
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 813 P.2d 710 Ariz. 1991
- Wyatt v. Wehmueller 806 P.2d 870 Ariz. 1991