Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rawlings v. Apodaca, 726 P.2d 565.

327 citing documents.

Wyatt v. Wehmueller 806 P.2d 870 Ariz. 1991
McCarthy Western Constructors, Inc. v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 821 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
McCarthy Western Constructors, Inc. v. Phoenix Resort Corp. 821 P.2d 181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
our supreme court held that good faith and fair dealing are implied in every contract.
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 798 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal. 798 P.2d 1308 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. Santa Cruz 800 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1990
INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. Santa Cruz 800 P.2d 585 Ariz. 1990
(quoting Flint & Walling Mfg.
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Farr v. Transamerica Occidental Life Ins.
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Stevens 802 P.2d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
490 , 74 L.Ed.2d 632 (1982)
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Mutual Insurance v. Bodnar 793 P.2d 560 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 792 P.2d 719 Ariz. 1990
Rogers v. Feltz 788 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Rogers v. Feltz 788 P.2d 1213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
where the court discusses the type of contractual relationships from which one can recover punitive damages for breach of contract.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Wilson 782 P.2d 727 Ariz. 1989
Co., , , (punitive damages available when defendant’s wrongful conduct was guided by “evil motives”).
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Clearwater v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 780 P.2d 423 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Noble v. National American Life Ins.
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Yetman v. English 786 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Gurule v. Illinois Mutual Life & Casualty Co.
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Olson v. Walker 781 P.2d 1015 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
An evil mind is found where the defendant intended to injure the plaintiff, or where the defendant, not intending to cause injury, “consciously pursued a course of conduct knowing that it created a substantial risk of significant harm to others.”
Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. 778 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1989
Dodge v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. 778 P.2d 1240 Ariz. 1989
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. Superior Court 778 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co v. Superior Court 778 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Asphalt Engineers, Inc. v. Galusha 770 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Asphalt Engineers, Inc. v. Galusha 770 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
PUNITIVE DAMAGES The trial court gave a , and Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins.
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio 764 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1988
Lasma Corp. v. Monarch Insurance Co. of Ohio 764 P.2d 1118 Ariz. 1988
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
White v. Mitchell 759 P.2d 1327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Appellants now contend that the wording of this instruction failed to convey the “evil mind”
Oldenburger v. Del E. Webb Development Co. 765 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Oldenburger v. Del E. Webb Development Co. 765 P.2d 531 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
The essence of that covenant “is that neither party will act to impair the right of the other to receive the benefits which flow from their agreement or contractual relationship.” -54 , -70 (1986).
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
Ranburger v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 760 P.2d 551 Ariz. 1988
This case was tried before this court’s , and Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins.
Verde Ditch Co. v. James 758 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Verde Ditch Co. v. James 758 P.2d 144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
James also argues that the only finding the trial court made about his conduct was that it was “obstreporous.” *373 To prove James’s evil mind, Verde Ditch could have proved either that James intended to injure it or that James “consciously pursued a course of conduct knowing that it created a substantial risk of significant harm to others.”
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 758 P.2d 1313 Ariz. 1988
212 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 ; (1987)
Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa County 749 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1988
Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa County 749 P.2d 1367 Ariz. 1988
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Lindsey v. University of Arizona 754 P.2d 1152 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Wagenseller, supra, 147 Ariz. at 380-81 , 710 P.2d at 1035-36 .
Volz v. Coleman Co., Inc. 748 P.2d 1191 Ariz. 1987