Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dessureault, 453 P.2d 951.

382 citing documents.

State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
State v. Perkins 686 P.2d 1248 Ariz. 1984
State v. Turner 688 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Turner 688 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Vaughn, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Perez 687 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1984
State v. Perez 687 P.2d 1214 Ariz. 1984
Pretrial hearings were held on June 7 , cert.
State v. Edwards 677 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Edwards 677 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); , , reh'g.
State v. Oppenheimer 673 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Oppenheimer 673 P.2d 318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Mumford 666 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Mumford 666 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Watson 653 P.2d 351 Ariz. 1982
State v. Watson 653 P.2d 351 Ariz. 1982
Before the Williams’ trial, counsel for Williams requested a , cert.
State v. Stolp 650 P.2d 1195 Ariz. 1982
State v. Stolp 650 P.2d 1195 Ariz. 1982
State v. Thibeault 639 P.2d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Thibeault 639 P.2d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Navallez 639 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Navallez 639 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
We believe the trial court’s
State v. Mena 624 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mena 624 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1981
1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); , cert.
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
On 14 March, Gretzler filed a motion for change of venue and a , cert.
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980
State v. Schilleman 609 P.2d 564 Ariz. 1980
State v. Brown 608 P.2d 299 Ariz. 1980
State v. Brown 608 P.2d 299 Ariz. 1980
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); , cert.
State v. Padilla 595 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1979
State v. Padilla 595 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1979
DESSUREAULT HEARING Prior to the first trial (relating to the August and October sales), Padilla moved for a , cert.
State v. Longoria 596 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Longoria 596 P.2d 1179 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
“This presumption we deem conclusive for the obvious reason that all litigation, even criminal, must end at some point.”
State v. Trujillo 587 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1978
State v. Trujillo 587 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1978
State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
The appellant requested a , cert.
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. McGill 580 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1978
State v. McGill 580 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1978
State v. Bailes 578 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Bailes 578 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
where the lineup was held unduly suggestive because the defendant was the only person who had a moustache and a beard.
State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
In support of his theory that the lineup was structured so that it would not be a test of Seth’s ability to discriminate, , the appellant theorizes that this statement demonstrates that Seth merely chose the only man meeting the prior description he had given the police, and that the statement expresses “the fact that while that must be the man, I really don’t recognize him”.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by