Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dessureault, 453 P.2d 951.

382 citing documents.

State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); , , reh.
State v. Torres 569 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1977
State v. Torres 569 P.2d 807 Ariz. 1977
967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); , cert.
State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
In support of his contentions that he was denied that right here
State v. Lamb 568 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1977
State v. Lamb 568 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sanchez 568 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Sanchez 568 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Burnley 560 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1977
State v. Burnley 560 P.2d 818 Ariz. 1977
State v. LaBarre 561 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. LaBarre 561 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Moody 560 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1977
State v. Moody 560 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
At a , Mrs. N testified that as appellant was driving her to the area where the rape occurred she got a good side view of appellant since they were still in lighted parts of town; also that at one point during the rape he made her get on top of him and have intercourse and at that time she could see hi
State v. Jones 558 P.2d 912 Ariz. 1976
State v. Jones 558 P.2d 912 Ariz. 1976
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
Error is asserted in the trial court’s determination reached after a , that even though the circumstances of the pre-trial identification may have been unduly suggestive, the in-court identification was not tainted by the prior identification.
State v. Williams 556 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1976
State v. Strickland 556 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1976
State v. Strickland 556 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1976
Additionally, a , wherein the proposed in-court identification of the appellant by Mrs. Legge was held to be admissible.
State v. Williams 556 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1976
In viewing the photos, Sanders, according to his own and police testimony at a Dessureault hearing [ , ] held before trial, quickly identified the appellant as the robber.
State v. Cozad 556 P.2d 312 Ariz. 1976
State v. Cozad 556 P.2d 312 Ariz. 1976
State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
We find that any possible error in allowing the in-court identification by the victim was rendered completely harmless by appellant’s waiver of a Dessureault hearing [ , ] and reliance instead, on the motion pleadings, and by the presentation of the defense case.
State v. Winters 556 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Winters 556 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Ware 554 P.2d 1264 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ware 554 P.2d 1267 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ware 554 P.2d 1264 Ariz. 1976
1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); , cert.
State v. Ware 554 P.2d 1267 Ariz. 1976
Questions as to whether there has been an accurate in-court identification of the defendant, not tainted by prior identification procedures and whether such procedures were fair, are preliminary questions for the trial court, , cert.
State v. Taylor 554 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Taylor 554 P.2d 926 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Having determined that the photo lineup was not unduly suggestive, , cert.
State v. Arnold 549 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Arnold 549 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
A Dessureault hearing, , supplemented, , cert.
State v. Armijo 549 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Armijo 549 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
rehearing denied , cert.
State v. Tuell 541 P.2d 1142 Ariz. 1975
State v. Tuell 541 P.2d 1142 Ariz. 1975