Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Dessureault, 453 P.2d 951.

382 citing documents.

State v. Carriger 541 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1975
State v. Carriger 541 P.2d 554 Ariz. 1975
Matters which could have been determined by the mere asking, if not raised, will be deemed settled adversely to the accused.”
State v. Jackson 539 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1975
State v. Jackson 539 P.2d 906 Ariz. 1975
State v. Scott 537 P.2d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Scott 537 P.2d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
He first urges that it was error for the trial court not to grant a , immediately after a witness identified him in court.
State v. Bojorquez 535 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1975
State v. Bojorquez 535 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1975
State v. Harris 533 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Harris 533 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
On this appeal, defendant raises three issues: , cert.
State v. Williams 526 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1974
State v. Williams 526 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1974
State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
Prior to the start of the defendant’s trial
State v. Adrian 522 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1974
State v. Adrian 522 P.2d 1091 Ariz. 1974
State v. Morales 520 P.2d 1136 Ariz. 1974
State v. Morales 520 P.2d 1136 Ariz. 1974
rehearing denied, , cert.
State v. Meronek 520 P.2d 492 Ariz. 1974
State v. Meronek 520 P.2d 492 Ariz. 1974
State v. Lee 519 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1974
State v. Lee 519 P.2d 56 Ariz. 1974
the trial court failed to make factual determinations as required by Dessureault, supra.
State v. Rodriquez 514 P.2d 1245 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rodriquez 514 P.2d 1245 Ariz. 1973
September 26, 1973; , , September 20, 1973; , , , cert.
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411, 1972 , and of this court, , ”
State v. Taylor 514 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 514 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1973
State v. Flynn 514 P.2d 466 Ariz. 1973
State v. Flynn 514 P.2d 466 Ariz. 1973
State v. Downing 511 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1973
State v. Downing 511 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1973
The trial court held a , cert.
State v. Rood 510 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Rood 510 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
At trial a hearing was held prior to the admission of Mrs. Collins’ testimony as to identification
State v. Salcido 509 P.2d 1027 Ariz. 1973
State v. Salcido 509 P.2d 1027 Ariz. 1973
State v. Miranda 509 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1973
State v. Miranda 509 P.2d 607 Ariz. 1973
Before Miss McDaniel identified the defendant at trial, a
State v. Rendel 509 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Rendel 509 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Stow 508 P.2d 1144 Ariz. 1973
State v. Stow 508 P.2d 1144 Ariz. 1973
rdict of guilty, you must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the in-court identification was independent of the previous pretrial identification or if not derived from an independent source, you must find from other evidence in the case that the defendant is the guilty person beyond a reasonable doubt.” This instruction is a
State v. Fish 508 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1973
State v. Fish 508 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1973
rehearing denied , cert.
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rocha 506 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rocha 506 P.2d 1061 Ariz. 1973
The defense took exception to the “one-man lineup” , ; Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1999 , 87 S.Ct.
State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
This Court, , established the following principle: “.