Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Palmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Palmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mendoza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Mendoza’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous after a diligent search of the record.
State v. Thomason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Thomason Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Counsel for Thomason filed a brief stating “there are no non-frivolous issues to raise on direct appeal.” Citing Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel asks this court to review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
F U R U Y A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Missell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Missell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Trevor David Missell timely appealed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for possession or use of dangerous drugs, a class four felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class six felony.
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Chee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Chee’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Mills Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hardy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
After searching the record and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, Hardy’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. McKenna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. McKenna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
McKenna’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This timely appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Bowdish Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Bowdish Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
S W A N N, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Mark Bowdish’s convictions and sentences for possession of dangerous drugs for sale and possession of drug paraphernalia.
State v. Hilton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
S W A N N, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Corey Thomas Hilton’s convictions and sentences for one count of possession or use of dangerous drugs, a class 4 felony, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class 6 felony.
State v. Carrasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Carrasco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Pete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Pete Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jordan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Riggins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Riggins’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Dadah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Dadah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Further, citing Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel requests we review the record for fundamental error.
State v. Seda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Seda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Michael Alex Seda timely appealed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for one count of possession or use of dangerous drugs, a class four felony, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia, a class six felony.
State v. Halterman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Halterman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Halterman’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Hanss Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Waters Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Reynosa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reynosa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
H O W E , Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)