Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Quarmby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Grigsby Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Grigsby’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Martinez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Martinez-Tapia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
F U R U Y A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Darragh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Darragh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
STATE v. DARRAGH Decision of the Court P A T O N, Judge: ¶1 In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) Michael Gabriel Darragh appeals his conviction for burglary in the second degree.
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
STATE v. BROWN Decision of the Court P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Cowan Lamar Brown timely appealed the superior court’s restitution order in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Hill Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶2 Hill’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Faiz-Fahmy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Faiz-Fahmy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
G A S S, Vice Chief Judge: STATE v. FAIZ-FAHMY Decision of the Court ¶1 Jamie Ruth Faiz-Fahmy appeals her conviction and probation grant under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Ruelas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P A T O N, Judge: ¶1 Manuel Gonzalez Ruelas filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Beatte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Haley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Haley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Haley’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Beatte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Jay Dee Beatte, Jr., timely appealed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for molestation of a child, a class two felony.
State v. Borota Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Borota Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Kyle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Kyle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
P A T O N, Judge: ¶1 In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) Shawn Patrick Kyle appeals his conviction for resisting arrest.
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Wright Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Orellana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Orellana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
After searching the record and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, Orellana’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Lee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Munoz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
STATE v. MUNOZ Decision of the Court P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Francisco Ray Munoz timely appealed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for misconduct involving weapons, a class four felony.
State v. Barajas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Krick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Krick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Krick’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Barajas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
G A S S, Vice Chief Judge: STATE v. BARAJAS Decision of the Court ¶1 Antonio Jose Barajas filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dixson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dakins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Dakins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Jenkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Jenkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)