Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Nunez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law, Black’s attorney filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Orrico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Orrico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
G A S S, Judge: ¶1 Aaron Frank Orrico filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Axton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Axton’s appellate counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Gilder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gilder Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
G A S S, Judge: ¶1 Andre Armone Gilder filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
STATE v. PACHECO Decision of the Court C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gonzales Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Gonzales’s counsel filed this appeal in accord with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Muehlhausen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Muehlhausen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Moore’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jones’ counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous after a diligent search of the record.
State v. Aston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Aston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aston’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Lunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Lunt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Carter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Fender Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
W I N T H R O P, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Samora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Samora Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Artishon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law, Artishon’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Jaramillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Jaramillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Hughes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Collins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Thomas’ counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Salmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Salmon’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Hughes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Hughes’ counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Pita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Pita Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Lawrence Christopher Thomas timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for aggravated domestic violence, a class 5 felony.
State v. Nimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Matz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Matz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Matz’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Nimer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Nimer’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, and asking this court to search the record for reversible error.