Cited by

B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537, ¶ 30.

G A S S, Judge: ¶1 Ronald Alford filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Marty Joseph Morales, Jr. filed a timely appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for aggravated assault, a class 5 felony.

P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Priscila O., a juvenile, timely filed this appeal, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Maricopa Cty.

B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Defense counsel then filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967)

Carrillo’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.

Counsel for Christopher has advised this Court that counsel found no arguable questions of law and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.

C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law, Jones’ counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.

Fields’ counsel filed a brief following Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating that he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law on any issue.

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating that she has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.

McDonald’s counsel asked this court to search the record for fundamental error in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

After searching the record and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, Varela’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.

C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

G A S S, Judge: ¶1 Frank Ed Ahumada filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Fronczak’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.