Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Konie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Konie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
G A S S, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Augustine M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Augustine M., a juvenile, timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Maricopa Cty.
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Spriggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Tharp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Spriggs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Tharp Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Sells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
In Re Randall A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Sells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
In Re Randall A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Maricopa Cty.
State v. Giron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Ruben Giron timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia, a class 6 felony.
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gibson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
S W A N N, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from probation-violation proceedings that resulted in the revocation of Benny David Gibson’s probation on one count and the reinstatement of his probation on another count.
State v. Redmond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Redmond Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
STATE v. REDMOND Decision of the Court H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Standard Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating he has searched the record for error but has found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rodriguez’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lynch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Martinez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Behlke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Mark Steven Behlke, Jr., timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for nine counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices, a class 2 felony; two counts of trafficking in stolen property in the first degree, a class 2 felony; and one count of failure to appear in the first degree, a class 5 felony.
State v. Dunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Bryan Darnell Dunn filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of misconduct involving weapons, a Class 4 felony.
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶7 Mendoza’s appellate counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Lester Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Taylor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Maddux Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Nash Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Loustaunau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Harrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Loustaunau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
S W A N N, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Sarah Anne Loustaunau’s convictions and sentences for taking the identity of another and theft of a credit card.
State v. Amey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Amey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.