Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Naranjo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law, Naranjo’s counsel filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Acosta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law, Acosta’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this Court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Herrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
S W A N N, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Aureliano Hernandez Herrera’s conviction and sentence for sexual assault.
State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Robinson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Robinson’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Eschrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: Christian Eschrich filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of: (1) aggravated domestic violence by interfering with judicial proceedings, a Class 5 felony; (2) aggravated assault by domestic violence, a Class 4 felony; (3) robbery, a Class 4 felony; and (4) sexual assault by domestic violence, a Class 2 felony.
State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Kornack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Kornack’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Singleton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Cory A. Singleton timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for possession of a dangerous drug, a class 4 felony; and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class 6 felony.
State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Villa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
S W A N N, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Donna G. Villa’s conviction and sentence for aggravated assault.
State v. Pena Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Pena’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Getscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Timlick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Robert Paul Campbell, Jr. timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of possession of marijuana, a Class 6 felony, and possession of marijuana for sale, a Class 4 felony.
State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Robert Paul Campbell, Jr. timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of one count of possession of marijuana, a Class 6 felony, and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia, each a Class 6 felony.
State v. Timlick Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Richard B. Timlick timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for aggravated assault, a class 2 felony, driving under the influence of alcohol while impaired to the slightest degree, a class 1 misdemeanor, driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) of 0.08 or greater, a class 1 misdemeanor, and unlawful fli
State v. Getscher Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, Smith’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
In Re Kenai C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
In Re Kenai C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Gates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dunbar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Nelson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating he has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Gates Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Dunbar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Nunnery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brandy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brandy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
STATE v. BRANDY Decision of the Court H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Nunnery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This is a consolidated appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Coleman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. White Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Silas Deon White timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of possession of a narcotic drug for sale and transporting or transferring a narcotic drug for sale, both Class 2 felonies.
State v. Meiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
STATE v. DOMINGUEZ Decision of the Court C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Meiner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this court to search the record for fundamental error.