Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Perkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Perkins’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Kluver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kluver’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising that after searching the record on appeal, he found no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Moore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Moore’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Porter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Akins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Akins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dennison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dennison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Mendivil Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Johnny L. Mendivil timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his convictions of criminal trespass and possession of drug paraphernalia, each a Class 6 felony, and possession of a dangerous drug, a Class 4 felony.
State v. Maxfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Maxfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating that he has searched the record on appeal and has found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Maloy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Scalph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Scalph Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Maloy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
S W A N N, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from Gary Maloy’s convictions and sentences for molestation of a child, sexual conduct with a minor, and indecent exposure.
State v. Small Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sonne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Sonne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case, CR2016-00842, comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Small Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H U M M A, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Bracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Samuels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Russell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Bracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bracy’s counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising that after searching the record on appeal, he found no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Samuels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Aaron Paul Samuels’ (“Samuels”) conviction for burglary in the second degree.
State v. Russell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Russell’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
In Re Angel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Vanesian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
In Re Angel M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Juvenile’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); and Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-117258, -87 (App. 1989), stating that she has searched the record on appeal and found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Vanesian Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); stating that he has searched the record on appeal and has found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. McCollum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Josytewa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Josytewa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. McCollum Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, McCollum’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for reversible error.
State v. Pino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Counsel for Pina filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising that after searching the record on appeal, he found no meritorious grounds for reversal.
State v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Quiroz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Redondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Redondo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Quiroz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
T H U M M A, Chief Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Arias-Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Arias-Luna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Arias-Luna’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Pacheco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Arnold Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017