Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leon, 451 P.2d 878.

2476 citing documents.

State v. Alvarez-Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Borgerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Borgerson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
center000 T H U M M A, Judge: * This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
State v. Alvarez-Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he searched the record for error but found no arguable question of law.
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This case comes to us as an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Hiles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Garrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Garrison Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969).
State v. Hiles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he has searched the record on appeal and has found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Hobbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Escalante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hobbs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Marlon Lawrence Hobbs timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following his conviction of two counts of aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, each a Class 4 felony.
State v. Escalante Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked that we review the record for reversible error.
State v. Taubman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Taubman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel has searched the record, found no arguable question of law, and asked that we review the record for reversible error.
State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
After searching the record on appeal and finding no arguable question of law that was not frivolous, Cabrera’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Hassell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hassell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hassell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Barry Michael Hassell (Defendant) appeals his convictions for: (1) escape in the second degree, a class 5 felony; (2) interference with a monitoring device, a class 4 felony; and (3) misconduct involving weapons, a class 4 felony, and the respective sentences.1 ¶2 Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Hassell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
endant) appeals his convictions for: (1) two counts of first degree murder, a class 1 dangerous felony; (2) second-degree burglary of a home, a class 3 felony, and (3) conspiracy to commit burglary of a vehicle, a class 3 felony, and the respective sentences imposed.1 ¶2 Defendant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ali Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Graham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ali Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Khalilah Ali timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), following her conviction of aggravated assault, a Class 5 felony; resisting arrest, a Class 6 felony; and driving on a suspended license, a Class 1 misdemeanor.
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Graham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jimenez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jimenez’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.
State v. Hoag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hoag Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asked this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Tracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tracy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Lawrence Andrew Tracy Jr.’s (“Tracy”) conviction for third- degree burglary.
State v. King Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Aaron Dontel King’s convictions.
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Therefore, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leyva-Nafarrate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Yazzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Leyva-Nafarrate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶2 Appellant’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he searched the record for error but found no arguable question of law.
State v. Yazzie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following Patrick Yazzie’s conviction for possession of dangerous drugs, a Class 4 felony.
State v. McGhee Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
J O H N S E N, Judge: ¶1 Quinel James McGhee timely filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from his conviction of burglary in the second degree, a Class 3 felony.
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); P.2d 878 (1969), stating he has searched the record on appeal and has found no arguable question of law that is not frivolous.
State v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mejia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
B E E N E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following the revocation of Jose Mariano Mejia’s probation.
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Flores Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
T H O M P S O N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was timely filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967), P.2d 878 (1969).