Cited by

Molina Torres appeals his convictions and sentences pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967)

P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Eric Stein Anderson timely filed his appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his conviction for kidnapping and attempt to commit second degree murder, both class 2 dangerous felonies (involving victim, Sarah), and two counts of aggravated assault, a class 3 dangerous felony (involving victims, Richard and Charlie respectively).

F U R U Y A, Judge: ¶1 Carmen Difilippantonio (“Defendant”) appeals, under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from his convictions and sentences for two counts of child molestation and two counts of sexual conduct with a minor.

J A C O B S, Judge: ¶1 Robert Terrell Graves (Defendant) appeals under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from convictions and sentences arising from an interaction with peace officers.

Knapp’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Patten’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

Counsel for Melendez filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising us there were no meritorious grounds for reversal.

F O S T E R, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

We received a brief from Simmons’ counsel in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) certifying that he diligently searched the record and found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

Counsel for Riggins filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

C A M P B E L L, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

STATE v. CRAIG Decision of the Court G A S S, Vice Chief Judge: ¶1 Shane Edward Craig filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

P A T O N, Judge: ¶1 Steven Wayne Heydorn appeals his conviction for aggravated harassment pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Kyle’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

B A I L E Y, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Ramirez-Vazquez’s counsel has advised us that in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel has diligently searched the record and found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

His previous defense counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no meritorious grounds for reversal.

We received a brief from Scott’s counsel in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Navarrette’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.