Cited by

Gordon’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after diligently searching the record, counsel has found no arguable issues to raise on appeal.

Trotter’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, she found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Counsel for Sanchez filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) certifying that, after diligently searching the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

Prall’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259 (2000); Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); advising the court that after searching the entire record, he is unable to identify any arguable question of law and requesting that we independently review the record for fundamental error.

Brown’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.

F U R U Y A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

C R U Z, Judge: ¶1 This appeal was filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.

STATE v. LOPEZ Decision of the Court B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

P E R K I N S, Judge: ¶1 Jose Paz Silva Calderon timely appealed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) following his convictions for second-degree burglary, kidnapping (both involving victim, Maria), and two counts of threating or intimidating (involving victim Maria and Maria’s family, respectively).

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Defense counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.

Counsel for Rathman filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

Counsel for Moore filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, counsel found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

T H U M M A, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Punnett’s counsel filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that, after a diligent search of the record, he found no arguable question of law that was not frivolous.

After searching the record and finding no arguable, non-frivolous question of law, Winfield’s counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asking this court to search the record for fundamental error.

G A S S, Chief Judge: MEMORANDUM DECISION ¶1 Sharalyn M. Stura filed this appeal in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

F O S T E R, Judge: ¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

B R O W N, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is presented to us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Lewis now appeals his convictions and sentences pursuant to Anders v. California, 368 U.S. 738 (1967)

H O W E, Judge: ¶1 This appeal is filed in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

Vavages’ counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising this court that, after reviewing the record, she was unable to discover any arguable question of law to raise on appeal.

In accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), defense counsel asks this Court to search the record for fundamental error.

Defense counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), advising us there are no meritorious grounds for reversal.