Cited by

Co., ¶ 7 (App. 1998) ().

Co., ¶ 50 (App. 1998) (as amended and corrected) (declining to address a claim made without supporting authority or argument).

Co., ¶ 50 (App. 1998) (declining to address a claim made without supporting authority or argument).

Co., ¶ 50 (App. 1998)); see also ARCAP 13(a)(7) (stating an argument section must contain “supporting reasons for each contention,” “citations of legal authorities,” and “appropriate references to the portions of the record on which the appellant relies”).

Co., ¶ 36 (App. 1998) (“We do not reweigh evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses.”); (“We may only consider the matters in the record before us.”).

Co., ¶ 50 (App. 1998)); see also Polanco v. Indus.

Co., ¶ 30 (App. 1998) (holding that a party asserting that the superior court denied her right to due process must show how the lack of additional time harmed her case).

Co., ¶ 36 (App. 1998), and will not reverse the court’s findings simply based on the existence of conflicting evidence, In re U.S. Currency, 199 Ariz. at 295, ¶ 9.

Co., ¶ 7 (App. 1998), we review the exclusion or admission of evidence under an abuse of discretion standard.

Co., ¶ 36 (App. 1998) (citing Godwin v. Farmers Ins.

Co., ¶ 30 (App. 1998) (citation omitted).