Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 971 P.2d 1046.

451 citing documents.

Fernando G. v. Dcs, L.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Fernando G. v. Dcs, L.G. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emily B., Andrew D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Emily B., Andrew D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Mother specifically argues that the court “did not rule on the issue of futility if additional services were offered.” DCS is not required to provide every conceivable service or “undertake rehabilitative measures that are futile.”
Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cristina G., Estevanico P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Cristina G., Estevanico P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶¶ 34, 37 (App. 1999).
Morgan B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susette G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Susette G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jimmy F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Jimmy F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
4 JIMMY F. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court Sec., ¶¶ 28–31 (App. 1999).
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Destiny F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dawn S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Dawn S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shawna N., John N. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Shad C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (citing JS-5209, 143 Ariz. at 189).
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Selina Z. v. Dcs, D.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Leah M. v. Dcs, K.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 1 (App. 1999) (stating DCS must show it made “all reasonable efforts to preserve the family relationship”).
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rachael A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 8-533(B)(8); ¶ 30 (App. 1999) (discussing the difference between “reasonable efforts” and “diligent efforts”); (requiring DCS to “provide services that have a reasonable prospect of success to remedy the circumstances as they arise throughout the time-in-care period”(e
Lucia D. v. Dcs, R.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Felisha L. v. Dcs, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Felisha L. v. Dcs, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Lucia D. v. Dcs, R.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Jaime Q. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber H. v. Dcs, E Al. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Vincent S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Matthew J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (citing Maricopa Cty.
Christopher H. v. Dcs, M.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999), and proof that DCS made a “diligent effort to provide appropriate reunification services,” Jordan C., 223 Ariz. at 93, ¶ 17.
Vincent S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Desiree A., Donovan J. v. Dcs, D.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶¶ 34, 37 (App. 1999) (citations omitted).
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Amber M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paule C. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Paule C. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., – 92, ¶ 32 (App. 1999), which includes undertaking “‘measures with a reasonable prospect of success’ in reuniting the family.” Jordan C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
State v. Bergen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bergen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 42 (App. 1999)).
Sara K. v. Dcs, N.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sara K. v. Dcs, N.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019