Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 971 P.2d 1046.

451 citing documents.

Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brandon H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., ¶ 42 (App. 1999)).
Donald W. v. Dcs, M.D. 444 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Donald W. v. Dcs, M.D. 444 P.3d 258 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
A “reasonable effort” requires DCS “to undertake measures with a reasonable prospect of success.” ¶ 34 (App. 1999).
Edan A. v. Dcs, A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Edan A. v. Dcs, A.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
§ 8-533(B)(3) and (10) do not explicitly require diligent efforts but argues that our caselaw has held that DCS is nevertheless bound by its constitutional duty to make “reasonable efforts to preserve the family.” See, ¶ 32 (App. 1999).
Delcia F. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Delcia F. v. Dcs, Z.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ramiro A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ramiro A. v. Dcs, J.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Denisse P. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fatuma H. v. Dcs, P.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., 192, ¶¶ 1, 34 (App. 1999) (In dependency based on mental-health grounds, State must offer reunification services even though statute does not expressly require it.).
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Mark M. v. Dcs, A.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Sec., 192-93, ¶¶ 1, 37, 42 (App. 1999); Maricopa Cty.
Dolores R. v. Dcs, F.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Dolores R. v. Dcs, F.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -93, ¶¶ 33, 42 (App. 1999).
Sydnee J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sydnee J. v. Dcs, M.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 33 (App. 1999) (“Arizona courts have long required the State .
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alyssa W. v. Justin G., J.G. 433 P.3d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Nicole L. v. Dcs, N.B. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 425 P.3d 1089 Ariz. 2018
In Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, the court of appeals held that in addition to proving a statutory ground, the state must prove “an additional element”; specifically, whether it “made reasonable efforts to preserve the family relationship[.]” ¶ 28 (App. 1999).
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Larrissa P. v. Dcs, J.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Johanna M. v. Dcs, Y.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., –92 ¶¶ 29–33 (App. 1999).
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Kevin E. v. Dcs, A.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999).
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Trisha A. v. Dcs 424 P.3d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 43 (App. 1999) (quoting Maricopa Cty.
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jessica C., Joel A. v. Dcs, J.Z. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶¶ 33–34, 37 (App. 1999); Maricopa Cty.
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Linda B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999), but it “is clearly not obligated to provide services which are futile[,]” Pima Cty.
Jeuda K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Titus S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Titus S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
¶ 32, quoting *1146 In re Maricopa Cty.
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Hannah B. v. Dcs, M.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wayne W., Patricia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Wayne W., Patricia B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶¶ 35-36 (App. 1999).
Jessica M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Jessica M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 31 (App. 1999)).
Maria O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Maria O. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (requiring efforts to reunify the family before termination due to mental illness).