Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 971 P.2d 1046.

451 citing documents.

Anthony W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Anthony W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In so holding, which further requires that DCS provide such rehabilitative services if the services “could restore [the] parent’s ability to care for a child within a reasonable time.” Id.
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Laura L. v. Dcs, J.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sarah R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sarah R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Brittnie C., Procoro R. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (recognizing the state must only “undertake measures with a reasonable prospect of success”).
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Alma S. v. Dep't of Child Safety 418 P.3d 925 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
192, ¶¶ 32-34, , 1053 (App. 1999).
Mary C. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mary C. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lynda H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lynda H. v. Dcs, J.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Victor B., Elizabeth B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Victor B., Elizabeth B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 37 (App. 1999) (citation and quotation omitted).
Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amber S. v. Dcs, L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999), but it “is clearly not obligated to provide services which are futile,” Pima Cty.
Amal A., Abdulsalam T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Amal A., Abdulsalam T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jason v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jason v. v. Dcs, J.V. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Susan J. v. Dcs, S.J. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (citations omitted).
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 34, (recognizing the state must only “undertake measures with a reasonable prospect of success”).
Tasha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Tasha T. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (termination of parental rights pursuant to § 8-533(B)(3) requires finding of reasonable effort to preserve family); see also Jennifer G. v. Ariz. Dep't of Econ.
Andres M., Robert M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Andres M., Robert M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., –87, ¶ 1 (App. 1999).
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Maurice N. v. Dcs, M.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mayra T. v. Dcs, C.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Mayra T. v. Dcs, C.L. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Floyd R. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Floyd R. v. Dcs, S.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., -87, ¶ 1 (App. 1999).
Jamie T. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Jamie T. v. Dcs, A.F. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 33 (App. 1999); Vanessa H. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.
Kayoma S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kayoma S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., ¶ 37 (App. 1999) (citing Maricopa Cty.
Philip P., Katherine J. v. Dcs, V.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Billy K. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kristi S. v. Dcs, A.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
–92, ¶¶ 30-34 (App. 1999).
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Cassandra W., Michael S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶¶ 32-34 (App. 1999).
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Franswa C. v. Dcs, J.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (noting that DCS is required to make reasonable efforts to preserve the family but is not required to provide every conceivable service or undertake measures that are futile).