Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 971 P.2d 1046.

451 citing documents.

Arthur B. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Arthur B. v. Dcs, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999); Maricopa Cty.
Willie W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Willie W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Forrest C. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 1 (App. 1999) (citing Maricopa Cty.
Hallie D. v. Dcs, J.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Hallie D. v. Dcs, J.D. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
James M. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999)).
Alvin S. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Alvin S. v. Dcs, S.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jessica N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jessica N. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶¶ 33, 37 (App. 1999), arguing that the particular services offered must be "designed to improve the parent's ability to care for the child."
Laura G., Manuel A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Laura G., Manuel A. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Kathy S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Ronda J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Ronda J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 1 (App. 1999) (DCS is only obligated to undertake measures with a reasonable possibility of rehabilitating a parent.).
Derek M. v. Dcs, M.M., D.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Derek M. v. Dcs, M.M., D.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 1 (App. 1999), but the agency is not required “to provide every conceivable service or to ensure that a parent participates in each service it offers.” Christina G., 227 Ariz. at 235, ¶ 15.
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
David H. v. Dcs, T.H. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 (App. 1999)).
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Jon D., Kristie W. v. Dcs, C.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Teresa F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (citing Maricopa Cnty.
Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Lester L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 34 (App. 1999) (State not required to provide futile efforts at reunification); JD-5312, 178 Ariz. at 375-77 (affirming order, entered after hearing, denying visitation rights based on superior court's findings that visits with parent were so disruptive that termination of visits was in children's best interes
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Mary B., Christopher W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Guy N. v. Dcs, B.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., –92, ¶¶ 31–34, –53 (App. 1999).
Andrew B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Manuel W. v. Dcs, M.W. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 37 (App. 1999) (quoting Maricopa Cnty.
Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kimberly H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sec., ¶ 37, DCS is not required to provide every conceivable service or to ensure parents participate in each service offered.
Stephanie Z., David S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Stephanie Z., David S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robert D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Robert D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
James W. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
8 JAMES W. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court ¶27 Furthermore, DCS is not obligated to “undertake rehabilitative measures that are futile.” Mary Ellen C., ¶ 34
Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Joscilin S. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014