Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security, 971 P.2d 1046.

451 citing documents.

Megan M., Dustin J. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 37, (quoting Maricopa County Juv.
Cindy L., David L. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Victoria F. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lisa H. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Raquel D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Raquel D. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoberto O. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rigoberto O. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶ 34, (finding the State failed to make a reasonable rehabilitative effort to preserve a family before seeking a severance on mental illness grounds).
Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Kimberly P. v. Ades, T.P. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Tonya C. v. Ades, D.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anna T. v. Ades, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Anna T. v. Ades, J.T. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 319 P.3d 236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Sec., ¶¶ 32-34, (finding constitutional right to reunification services when ADES sought termination of parental rights based on mental illness).
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Sec., ¶ 34 , (citing Dep’t of *54 Econ.
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 256 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 231 P.3d 377 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Sec., -92, ¶¶ 31-34 , -53 (App.1999) (citation omitted).
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. , Jesse C., Kailynn C., Michele C. v. Ades Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 219 P.3d 296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Vanessa H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Donald W. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Donald W. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 159 P.3d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sec., ¶ 34 , 971 P.2d *205 1046, 1053 (App.1999).
Marina P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 152 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Marina P. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 152 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Sec., ¶ 32 , (holding that the State has a duty on constitutional grounds to make reasonable efforts to preserve the family).
Margaret H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 148 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Margaret H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 148 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Sec., ¶¶ 31-34, -53 (App. 1999).
Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 123 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 123 P.3d 186 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
Sec., ¶¶ 31-34, -53 (App. 1999).3 ¶13 Termination of Jennifer’s parental rights on the alternate, nine-months-in-care ground required proof that the children had been in a court-ordered, out-of-home placement for at least nine months; that ADES had “made a diligent effort to provide appropri
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 113 P.3d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Sec., ¶ 31 , (condition that renders parent who suffers from mental illness unable to discharge parental responsibilities must “be proven not to be amenable to rehabilitative services that could restore [the parent’s] ability to care for a child within a reasonable time”).
James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 106 P.3d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
James H. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 106 P.3d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
-92, ¶ 32 , -53 (App.1999), we observed regarding the constitutional protections implicated in seeking termination of parental rights that “[t]he combined effect of the fundamental character of a parent’s right to his child and the severity and permanence of termination dictates that the court s
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 83 P.3d 43 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Sec., ¶ 32 , (quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 , 102 S.Ct.
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Michael M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 42 P.3d 1163 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Minh T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 41 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Minh T. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 41 P.3d 614 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Sec., ¶ 25 , (citing Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 , 102 S.Ct.
Michael J. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 995 P.2d 682 Ariz. 2000
Toni W. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 993 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999