Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Associated Students of the University v. Arizona Board of Regents, 584 P.2d 564.

42 citing documents.

North Scottsdale v. Core Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
North Scottsdale v. Core Center Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
of Regents, (“The acts of parties under a contract, before disputes arise, are the best evidence of the meaning of doubtful contractual terms.”).
Aguilera v. Sannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Aguilera v. Sannes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
of Regents, (citation omitted).
Holm v. Gateway Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Holm v. Gateway Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
of Regents, -05 (App. 1978) (“Once a contract is determined to be ambiguous, extrinsic evidence may be resorted to for the purpose of ascertaining its real meaning”; “A determination of the surrounding facts, consideration of which is necessary to resolve ambiguities, is for the trier of fact”).
Gorman v. Pima County 287 P.3d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
Gorman v. Pima County 287 P.3d 800 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
the trial court apparently agreed but nevertheless resolved the issues primarily on other grounds.
Oliver v. Henry 260 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Oliver v. Henry 260 P.3d 314 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
of Regents, , ); , (recognizing that although our review of a ruling on a motion for summary judgment is made on the basis of the record made in the trial court, our review is de novo).
Dobrota v. Free Serbian Orthodox Church 952 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Dobrota v. Free Serbian Orthodox Church 952 P.2d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
of Regents, -05 , -69 (App. 1978).
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 854 P.2d 1134 Ariz. 1993
Koenen v. Royal Buick Co. 783 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Koenen v. Royal Buick Co. 783 P.2d 822 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Continental Bank v. Guaranty Warehouse Corp. 738 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Continental Bank v. Guaranty Warehouse Corp. 738 P.2d 1129 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
Jeski v. American Express Co. 708 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Jeski v. American Express Co. 708 P.2d 110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Leikvold v. Valley View Community Hospital, supra; , cert.
Technical Equities Corp. v. Coachman Real Estate Investment Corp. 701 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Technical Equities Corp. v. Coachman Real Estate Investment Corp. 701 P.2d 13 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
University Realty & Development v. Omid-Gaf Inc., 19 Ariz.App.
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co. 694 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad 694 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad 694 P.2d 299 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
12,13 , 207 S.E.2d 570, 572 (1974)
Leikvold v. Valley View Community Hospital 688 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1984
Leikvold v. Valley View Community Hospital 688 P.2d 170 Ariz. 1984
ver, if the court determines that the terms of the contract can be reasonably construed in more than one manner, the language is ambiguous, McDaniel & Associates v. Merodias Construction Co., Inc., , and extrinsic evidence may be used to ascertain the real meaning of the terms, , cert.
Farmers Insurance v. R.B.L. Investment Co. 675 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Farmers Insurance v. R.B.L. Investment Co. 675 P.2d 1381 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Patecell v. Cook 673 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Patecell v. Cook 673 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 681 P.2d 390 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
Abrams v. Horizon Corp. 669 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1983
see also Giovanelli v. First Fed.
Payne v. Pennzoil Corp. 672 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Payne v. Pennzoil Corp. 672 P.2d 1322 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8 669 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Phillips v. Flowing Wells Unified School District No. 8 669 P.2d 969 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Godbey v. ROOSEVELT SCH. DIST. NO. 66, ETC. 638 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
Godbey v. ROOSEVELT SCH. DIST. NO. 66, ETC. 638 P.2d 235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981