Cited by

But “it is generally agreed that a substantive law creates, defines, and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.” see also Aranda, 198 Ariz. at 470 ¶ 12 (“In general, procedural law relates to the manner and means by which a right to recover is enforced or provides no more than the method by which to proceed.”).

Conversely, a procedural law “prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.” Hall, 149 Ariz. at 138 (); see also Aranda, 198 Ariz. at 470 ¶ 12 (explaining a procedural law “relates to the manner and means by which a right to recover is enforced or provides no more than the method by which to proceed”); (“[T]he methods of perfecting and processing such rights ar

“[A] substantive law creates, defines and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.”

Substantive law “creates, defines and regulates rights” while a procedural law establishes only “the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.”

§ 1-244; (“It is well established that a statute will have prospective operation only unless it appears that it was intended to have retroactive effect.”); see also Aranda v. Indus.

(stating that “a statute relating solely to procedural law such as burden of proof and rules of evidence can be applied retroactively”).

Although there is no precise definition of either term, “it is generally agreed that a substantive law creates, defines and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.”

Freight Sys., Inc., , ( , ))).

‘it is generally agreed that a substantive law creates, defines, and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.’” 7 P.3d at 97

Substantive law is generally defined as "law [that] creates, defines and regulates rights.”

No. 66, , (accumulated paid sick leave); , (medical malpractice claim); Rio Rico Props., , (tax refunds); see also Thurston v. Judges’ Ret.

Under [this] exception, a statute does not have [impermissible] retroactive effect if it is merely procedural and does not affect an earlier established substantive right.” , ( , ).

(procedural rules may apply retroactively unless retroactive application would impair vested rights); , (same).

Generally, “a substantive law creates, defines and regulates rights while a procedural Daw] prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.”

“ ‘[I]t is generally agreed that a substantive law creates, defines and regulates rights while a procedural one prescribes the method of enforcing such rights or obtaining redress.’” Hall, 149 Ariz. at 138 , 717 P.2d at 442 ( , ).

Merchants Des-patch Transportation Corp. v. Arizona State Tax Commission, 20 Ariz.App.