Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance Company, 431 P.2d 921.
- Hirschi v. Hirschi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Hirschi v. Hirschi
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Co., (noting that a court cannot grant declaratory relief “unless the action includes all persons who have or claim an interest affected by the declaration”) (citation omitted).
- Maricopa v. Rana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Maricopa v. Rana Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Turley v. Beus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
Turley v. Beus
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gerow, 192 Ariz. at 14, ¶ 19 ( and Tovrea Land & ).
- Desert Gardens v. Town of Quartzsite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
Desert Gardens v. Town of Quartzsite
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co., (citations omitted).
- Marriage of Gerow v. Covill 960 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Marriage of Gerow v. Covill 960 P.2d 55 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Safeway Insurance v. Collins 963 P.2d 1085 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Safeway Insurance v. Collins
963 P.2d 1085
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
286-87 & n. 2, , 927-28 & n. 2 (1967) (stating that it is appropriate to use Rule 19 to join injured tort claimant in declaratory judgment action between insured and insurer).
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance 682 P.2d 388 Ariz. 1984
-
Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
682 P.2d 388
Ariz. 1984
Co., , but see Sparks v. Republic Nat.
- State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission 666 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
State Compensation Fund v. Industrial Commission
666 P.2d 542
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
The law is well settled in Arizona that the operation of the theory of estoppel cannot bring within the coverage of an insurance policy risks not covered by its terms, , *444 (1967)
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Evans 636 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Evans 636 P.2d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- Parks v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. 572 P.2d 801 Ariz. 1977
-
Parks v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
572 P.2d 801
Ariz. 1977
16 A.R.S., Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 8(d).
- Sellers v. Allstate Insurance Company 555 P.2d 1113 Ariz. 1976
-
Sellers v. Allstate Insurance Company
555 P.2d 1113
Ariz. 1976
Connolly v. *423 Great Basin Insurance Co.
- Sellers v. Allstate Insurance 544 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
Sellers v. Allstate Insurance
544 P.2d 699
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Aside from the fact that the doctrine of estoppel will normally not supply insurance coverage where none exists, , one of the elements of the doctrine is detrimental reliance by the insured.
- Citizens' Committee for the Recall of Williams v. Marston 507 P.2d 113 Ariz. 1973
- Citizens' Committee for the Recall of Williams v. Marston 507 P.2d 113 Ariz. 1973
- Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks 497 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc. v. Marks
497 P.2d 534
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
Maricopa Realty & Trust Co. v. VRD Farms, Inc.
- Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Company 496 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Heard v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Company 496 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
- Pesqueria v. FACTORY MUT. LIAB. INS. CO. OF AMER. 493 P.2d 1212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
Pesqueria v. Factory Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of America
493 P.2d 1212
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
410 , : “Motor vehicle liability policies issuable in Arizona under A.R.S § 28-1170, as amended, of the Safety Responsibility Act fall into two general categories: an ‘owner’s policy’ and an ‘operator’s policy.’
- Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc. 493 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Tiffany Incorporated v. WMK Transit Mix, Inc. 493 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- Cornet Stores v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAI 492 P.2d 1191 Ariz. 1972
-
Cornet Stores v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAI
492 P.2d 1191
Ariz. 1972
at 288 , , 73 A.L.R.2d 1 (1968).
- City of Phoenix v. Peterson 462 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- City of Phoenix v. Peterson 462 P.2d 829 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Maricopa Realty & Trust Company v. VRD Farms, Inc. 460 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Maricopa Realty & Trust Company v. VRD Farms, Inc. 460 P.2d 195 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1969
- Civil Service Employees Insurance Co. v. Roberts 460 P.2d 48 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Civil Service Employees Insurance Co. v. Roberts
460 P.2d 48
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Co., -288 , -929 (1967).
- Riley v. County of Cochise 455 P.2d 1005 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Riley v. County of Cochise
455 P.2d 1005
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
Lecky v. Staley, 6 Ariz.App.
- Reserve Insurance Company v. Staats 453 P.2d 239 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
-
Reserve Insurance Company v. Staats
453 P.2d 239
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1969
§ 28-1170, as amended, of the Safety Responsibility Act fall into two general categories: an “owner’s policy” and an “operator’s policy.” , 431 P,2d 921, 929 (1967).
- Allen v. Graham 446 P.2d 240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
-
Allen v. Graham
446 P.2d 240
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1968
An appellate court, no more than a trial court, can act as a “fountain of legal advice.” See