Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Glaze v. Marcus, 729 P.2d 342.
-
Nina Alley v. Pima County, Pima County Attorney's Office, Laura Conover
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2026
Moreover, “[w]e will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court.”
- KAUFMAN v. GUEVARA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
KAUFMAN v. GUEVARA
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(affirming a grant of summary judgment while acknowledging this court “will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court”).
- Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Phoenician Equity v. Dreambrands Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
- Hendershot v. Whyte Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
-
Hendershot v. Whyte
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(“We will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason.”).
- Barrett v. Landmark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Barrett v. Landmark
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In doing so, we will affirm the superior court’s ruling if “correct for any reason.”
- Hickey v. Hickey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
Hickey v. Hickey
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
We defer, however, to the court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous, id., and will affirm the court’s rulings if “correct for any reason.”
- Brady v. ades/esa Tax Unit Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Brady v. ades/esa Tax Unit
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(explaining appellate courts will uphold a superior court’s ruling if “correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the [superior] court”).
- McCoy v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- McCoy v. Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
- Left Thumb v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Left Thumb v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Bd., ¶ 12 (App. 2007) (“We will affirm the superior court if its ruling was ‘correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered’”) ().
- Koizumi v. Morogiello Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Koizumi v. Morogiello
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“We will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court.”).
- Shea v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Shea v. Maricopa
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
(“We will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court.”).
- Minor v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Minor v. Scottsdale
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
We will uphold the superior court’s ruling “if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the [superior] court.”
- Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Gaslight Inn v. Mutual of Enumclaw
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We will affirm the court’s “decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the [] court.”
- Acosta v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Acosta v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We will affirm the court’s “decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason 4 ACOSTA v. STATE, et al. Decision of the Court was not considered by the [] court.”
- Schiager v. Landmark Land Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
Schiager v. Landmark Land
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
We will affirm the court’s “decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the [] court.”
- Isles v. College Nannies & Tutors Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Isles v. College Nannies & Tutors Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
- Clemente Ranch v. Johnstonbaugh Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Clemente Ranch v. Johnstonbaugh
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Bd., ¶ 15 (App. 2016); (“We will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court.”).
- Olsen v. Allington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Olsen v. Allington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Green v. Rhoads Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Green v. Rhoads
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Although neither party addressed this statute in the superior court or on appeal, and it was only referenced for the first time in the ruling on Mother’s motion for reconsideration, we may affirm the superior court’s decision “if it is correct for any reason.”
- State v. Fortune Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Fortune Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Yacullo v. Cunniffe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Yacullo v. Cunniffe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Best v. Villareal Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Best v. Villareal
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“We will affirm the trial court’s decision if it is correct for any reason, even if that reason was not considered by the trial court.”).
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Menghini v. Menghini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Hopkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Hopkins Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- Water Works v. Jonas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Water Works v. Jonas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
& Supply Co., ), and will affirm if the ruling is correct on any basis supported by the record, ¶ 8 (App. 2006) ().
- Greenberg v. McGowan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019