Cited by

(declining to address whether the defendant “met the other two requirements of meritorious defense and prompt application for relief” when she did not show excusable neglect).

(App. 16 MAC KENZIE v. HOWERTON, et al. Decision of the Court 1992)).

¶ 7 (App. 2017) (stating that this Court relies on both found and implied facts in the judgment).

(“Implied in every judgment, in addition to the express findings made by the court, are any additional findings necessary to sustain the judgment, if reasonably supported by the evidence and not in conflict with the express findings.”); see also Mary Lou C. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ.

(“Implied in every judgment, in addition to the express findings made by the court, are any additional findings necessary to sustain the judgment, if reasonably supported by the evidence and not in conflict with the express findings.”).

(stating that any additional findings necessary to uphold the judgment are implied if reasonably supported by the evidence and not in conflict with the court’s express findings).

(stating a judgment is presumed correct, and the appellant bears the burden to show otherwise).

(stating a judgment is presumed correct, and the appellant bears the burden to show otherwise).

(stating that a judgment is presumed correct and the appellant bears the burden to show otherwise).

(stating that a judgment is presumed correct and the appellant bears the burden to show otherwise); see generally ARCAP 13(a)(6) (requiring a party to support contentions on appeal with specific references to the record and legal authorities).

(reviewing the denial of a motion to set aside default judgment for an abuse of discretion).