Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Livingston, 75 P.3d 1103.
- State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. 2025
-
State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto
Ariz. 2025
at 421 ¶ 17 ( ¶ 10 (App. 2003), for the proposition that statutory language in A.R.S.
- State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
-
State of Arizona v. Asalia Guadalupe Alvarez-Soto
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
4 STATE v. ALVAREZ-SOTO Opinion of the Court traffic stops based on facts that neither constitute a violation of the law nor constitute reasonable grounds to suspect the driver has committed an offense, they run afoul of the Fourth Amendment requirement that they possess objectively reasonable grounds for the intrusion.”
- State v. Law Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
Distinguished
State v. Law
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Law argues that a single instance of drifting over the fog line is insufficient to justify a stop.
- State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
-
State v. Woods
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Woods’ for the proposition that a stop is unreasonable if it is premised on a traffic violation that drivers routinely commit, is both a mischaracterization of Livingston and contrary to authority.
- State v. Hopson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
-
State v. Hopson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hopson claims the trooper lacked a sufficient basis to stop his vehicle for an alleged lane line violation under A.R.S.
- State v. Botch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Botch
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
See Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996); ¶ 13 (App. 2003).
- State v. Levesque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Levesque
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Instead, Levesque argues the lane change violation does not constitute a
- State v. Ribble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Ribble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- State v. Gutierrez 381 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
State v. Gutierrez
381 P.3d 254
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶9 -48, ¶¶ 6, 10 (App. 2003), in which an officer stopped a driver for violating A.R.S.
- State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State of Arizona v. Nicholas Olaf Kjolsrud, Loni Kay Kambitsch 371 P.3d 647 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
- State of Arizona v. Jesus Ramiro Moreno 340 P.3d 426 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Jesus Ramiro Moreno
340 P.3d 426
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
at 8 (Fourth Amendment tolerates only objectively reasonable mistakes); The detective would have made a mistake of law, for example, had he accurately estimated that a window allowed for forty percent light transmission, but incorrectly believed it violated § 28-959.01(A)(1).
- State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Valenzuela
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“In evaluating the reasonableness of a stop, the trial court must evaluate the totality of the circumstances” and even “seemingly small factual distinctions can affect a court’s conclusions as to the reasonableness of a stop.” n.1, ¶ 12, n.1 (App. 2003).
- State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
- State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
State of Arizona v. Hesam Mohajerin
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
Thus, although a petitioner seeking relief under § 13-4051 may certainly bring evidence of improper law enforcement motives to challenge an officer‟s credibility on a material fact, no language in § 13-4051 entitles a petitioner to relief on such evidence standing alone.
- State v. GARCIA-NAVARRO 226 P.3d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
State v. GARCIA-NAVARRO
226 P.3d 407
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
“We review the trial court’s granting of a motion to suppress for an abuse of discretion” but review de novo “the court’s ultimate legal determination of the propriety of a stop.”
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Cruz Cuevas 153 P.3d 414 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Cruz Cuevas 153 P.3d 414 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
- State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
- State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005