Cited by

(appellate court will not ignore fundamental error if found).

¶17 P.3d 135 (App. 2008), that it is not fundamental error for a superior court to fail to make an express finding that a defendant has the ability without substantial hardship to partially reimburse attorneys’ fees.

with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); ¶ 17, (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived).

See State v. Moreno–Medrano, ¶¶ 16–17, see also Ariz. R. Crim.

¶¶ 16-17 , our court holds criminal defendants strictly responsible for discharging their appellate burdens, and it is only fitting that we hold the state to the same standard.

Fundamental error is “error going to the foundation of the case, error that takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense, and error of such magnitude that the defendant could not possibly have received a fair trial.” ¶ 7, (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).

unless the party objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinctly the matter to which the party objects and the grounds of his or her objection.”); ¶¶ 16-17, (declining to review for fundamental error when appellant failed to raise claim in trial court and failed on appeal to address whether alleged error was fundamental).

¶¶ 16-17, (defendant waives argument alleged error at trial constituted fundamental error when he fails to argue issue on appeal); (failure to argue claim usually constitutes abandonment and waiver of such clai

(failure to argue fundamental error waives issue on appeal).

¶¶ 19-20 , (failure to raise claim in trial court constitutes forfeiture of claim absent fundamental and prejudicial error); , (failure to allege fundamental error waives claim on appeal).

(absent argument, fundamental error claim waived on appeal); (court will not ignore fundamental error if it finds it).

¶¶ 16-17, (declining to review for fundamental error when appellant failed to raise claim in trial court and failed on appeal to address whether alleged error was fundamental); ¶ 4, (arguments not presented unti

To warrant reversal, Allen must show “that error occurred, that it was fundamental, and that it prejudiced him.”

(concluding argument waived because defendant “d[id] not argue the alleged error was fundamental,” and although court will rectify fundamental error if apparent, none observed).

(noting fundamental error argument waived if not asserted); (“Although we do not search the record for fundamental error, we will not ignore it when we find it.”).

Co., , (fundamental error doctrine "may be limited” in civil cases to situations implicating deprivation of constitutional right); , (failure to allege fundamental error on appeal waives argument).

(noting fundamental error argument waived if not asserted); (“Although we do not search the record for fundamental error, we will not ignore it when we find it.”).

6 Moreno-Medrano, (fundamental error argument waived on appeal); see also Harrison v. United States, 392 U.S. 219, 222 (1968) (“A defendant who chooses to testify waives his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination .

(failure to argue fundamental error on appeal waives argument); (court will not ignore fundamental error if it finds it).

(fundamental error argument waived on appeal if not argued).

See State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349, ¶¶ 16-17, (declining to review for fundamental error when appellant failed to raise claim in trial court and failed on appeal to address whether alleged error was fundamental).

(fundamental error argument waived on appeal); (court will not ignore fundamental error if found); -15, -16 (App. 1987) (issue on appeal regarding