Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Moreno-Medrano, 185 P.3d 135.

118 citing documents.

In Re Delinquency of C.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Delinquency of C.R. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State of Arizona v. Andres Sanchez 537 P.3d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Andres Sanchez 537 P.3d 794 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
(argument waived when not argued on appeal), 4 ¶23 Our dissenting colleague is no doubt correct that there may be further and other procedural issues resulting from this opinion presented in succeeding cases, but our
State v. Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
¶ 17 (App. 2008) (noting that failure to argue fundamental error may 1 We cite to the current version of applicable statutes absent any change material to this decision.
State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Vargas 468 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Luis Armando Vargas 468 P.3d 739 Ariz. 2020
In doing so, as authority to the contrary.
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370, 384 (2010); ¶ 5 (App. 2008) (affirming a finding that a defendant waived his Miranda rights by “engaging in ‘a course of conduct indicating waiver’” (quoting North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 373 (1979))).
State v. Rea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Rea Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 17 (App. 2008) (“[The appellant] does not argue the [untimely-objected-to] 4 STATE v. REA Decision of the Court of the time of the proceedings and thus, that the burden should not fall on him to prove his abs
State v. Castro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Castro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 17 (App. 2008) (declining to review for fundamental error where an appellant failed to argue an alleged error was fundamental).
Ingrid G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Ingrid G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
at 447-48, ¶¶ 38-39; ¶ 17 (App. 2008) 3 INGRID G. v. DCS, et al. Decision of the Court (argument waived when defendant failed to “argue the alleged error was fundamental”).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-66, ¶ 9 (2001); ¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2008).
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 14 (App. 2008); -01 (1994) (“Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are certainly helpful on appellate review, they do not go to the foundation of the case or deprive a party of a fair hearing.”).
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Mullet Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶¶ 16-17 (App. 2008) (declining to review for fundamental error when appellant failed to raise claim in trial court and failed on appeal to address whether alleged error was fundamental); (holding that the failure to argue a claim usually constitutes abandonmen
State v. Satzman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Satzman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 18 (App. 2008) (absent argument or authority that the alleged error is fundamental, a defendant cannot sustain his or her burden to show fundamental error resulting in prejudice); –62, ¶ 18 (1998) (juror prejudice will not be presumed but must be demonstrated by objective eviden
State v. Aschenbrenner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Aschenbrenner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 17, (holding that because appellant failed to argue alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived).
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Paul v. Dana B. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 17, (holding that the failure to allege fundamental error waives the argument on appeal); see also Schabel v. Deer Valley Unified Sch.
State v. Urrea 398 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Urrea 398 P.3d 584 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
See also State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. *522 349, ¶ 17 , (fundamental error waived if not argued).
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
(appellate court will not ignore fundamental error if found).
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Lilian G. v. Dcs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
See State v. Moreno– Medrano, ¶ 17, (holding that the failure to allege fundamental error waives the argument on appeal).11 III.
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State of Arizona v. Craig Victor Coleman 385 P.3d 420 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
State of Arizona v. Craig Victor Coleman 385 P.3d 420 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
(review for fundamental, prejudicial error waived if not argued).
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Jaime Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Valencia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
See State v. Moreno–Medrano, ¶ 17
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 17 (App. 2008) (finding that failure to allege fundamental error waives argument altogether).
State v. Bogie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Bogie Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Defendant bears the burden of showing “that error occurred, that it was fundamental, and that it prejudiced him.” ¶ 16 (App. 2008).
State v. McKnelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. McKnelly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016