Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Payne, 225 P.3d 1131.
- State of Arizona v. Glenda Lorraine Rumsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- State of Arizona v. Glenda Lorraine Rumsey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
- State v. West 233 P.3d 1154 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
State v. West
233 P.3d 1154
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
(“[W]aiver is a procedural concept that courts do not rigidly employ in mechanical fashion.”); n. 8 , , 1145 n. 8 (App.2009) (“ ‘If application of a legal principle, even if not raised below, would dispose of an action on appeal and correctly explain the law, it is appropriate for us to consider the issue.’ ”), , State v.
- LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges 232 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges
232 P.3d 756
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
¶ 19 & n. 5, , 138-39 & n. 5 (App.2009) (finding reliance on constitutional and legislative history unnecessary to interpret statutory and constitutional provisions in light of provisions’ plain meaning).
- Arizona City Sanitary Dist. v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010