Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Peterson, 267 P.3d 1197.

47 citing documents.

State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
P. 16.2(b)(2); ¶ 9 (App. 2011).
State v. Conner 467 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Conner 467 P.3d 246 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
This court reviews “rulings on motions to suppress for abuse of discretion,” ¶ 10 (2017), reviewing legal conclusions de novo, ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Estevez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
“We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress for an abuse of discretion.” -08, ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Phillips Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 6 (App. 2011).6 6 The briefs on appeal do not address whether the subpoenas are proper under A.R.S.
State v. Dickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Dickson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Francois Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Francois Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P. 1.9(e) (“[T]he court may set a motion for argument or hearing.”) (emphasis added); ¶ 6 (App. 2011).
State v. Turner 416 P.3d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Turner 416 P.3d 872 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Peterson , , ¶ 6, , 1199-1200 (App. 2011).
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Schaeffer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Additionally, trial counsel failed to assert entitlement to a which holds that a defendant may be entitled to a hearing for an alleged Miranda violation by making "allegations which, if proved, would entitle him or her to suppression."
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Peltz 391 P.3d 1215 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
We review the trial court’s ruling for an abuse of discretion, , but we review de novo its legal determinations
State v. Deng Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Deng Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-08, ¶ 6 (App. 2011) (citations omitted).
State v. Manzanares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Manzanares Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶ 6 (App. 2011) (citations omitted).
State v. Malin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Malin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 6 (App. 2011) (citations omitted).
State v. Nissley 362 P.3d 493 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-Loya 352 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-Loya 352 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
he goals of timely administering justice and searching for the truth,’ we believe a remand for limited proceedings most efficiently resolves the issues at hand and preserves 11 STATE v. ONTIVEROS-LOYA Opinion of the Court [Ontiveros-Loya’s] right to seek relief from the court’s ruling on remand.” (citation omitted).
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cruz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 9, (defendant must state prima facie case for suppression to be entitled to a hearing).2 ¶5 At trial, Cruz was convicted on both counts and was sentenced to concurrent terms of 10 and 5 years in prison.
State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela 350 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Francisco L. Encinas Valenzuela 350 P.3d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Notice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Notice Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Spencer 333 P.3d 823 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. David J. Waller 333 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. David J. Waller 333 P.3d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Mitchell 323 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mitchell 323 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown 310 P.3d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013