Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Guillermo C. Becerra, 291 P.3d 994.

26 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Brian Matthew MacHardy 521 P.3d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
¶¶ 14-15 (App. 2013), and Innes
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Sanchez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 20 (App. 2013) (“A defendant’s right not to be subjected to double jeopardy is violated if he is convicted of both a greater and lesser-included offense.”).
State v. Aulbach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Aulbach Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
5 STATE v. AULBACH Decision of the Court it was not prejudicial error because “robbery is a lesser included offense of armed robbery” and “the court could have instructed on the lesser included offense of robbery”); ¶ 20 (App. 2013) (finding that driving with a prohibited drug in the body is a lesser-included offense of aggravated driving with a prohibited drug in the body); compare A.R.S.
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 28-982 authorizes an officer to stop a vehicle “any time there is reasonable cause to believe that a vehicle is unsafe” to inspect the vehicle and issue a written notice to the driver if appropriate, a function “‘totally divorced from’ criminal investigations.” ¶ 8 (App. 2013) (quoting Cady v. Dombrowski, 413 U.S. 433, 441 (1973)).
State v. Mack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mack Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wilson 333 P.3d 774 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
le inventory searches, -22 , -43 (1973); -49 , ¶ ¶ 20-26, -17 (App. 2010); the retrieval of a visible firearm from the cab of a truck parked in a busy, high-crime area, Mendoza-Ruiz, 225 Ariz. at 476, ¶ 12 , 240 P.3d at 1238 ; and the stop of a vehicle with a defective taillight, ¶¶ 8-10
State of Arizona v. Veronica Sanchez-Equihua 326 P.3d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Veronica Sanchez-Equihua 326 P.3d 321 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State v. Sajna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Sajna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 Noting its duty of candor to the tribunal, the State cites opinions by this court holding that a failure to conduct a colloquy regarding a jury trial waiver to obtain a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver “requires automatic reversal.” ¶ 12, ¶ 5, -20 ¶ 6, - 29 (App. 2007); ¶ 19
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Travis Hamilton Nereim 317 P.3d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶23 “A defendant’s right not to be subjected to double jeopardy is violated if he is convicted of both a greater and lesser- included offense.” review granted (Ariz. May 29, 2013).
State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. William Peter Moran 307 P.3d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Martin David Salazar-Mercado 304 P.3d 543 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro Delgado 303 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Manuel Alejandro Delgado 303 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by