Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony Hall, 322 P.3d 191.

38 citing documents.

State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Fullen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Rhone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Rhone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State v. Ariaga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Ariaga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hopson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Hopson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State of Arizona v. Maria Chavez Cisneros 534 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
State of Arizona v. Maria Chavez Cisneros 534 P.3d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
tamine.” 3 STATE v. CISNEROS Opinion of the Court relate to both marijuana and methamphetamine.” We review de novo questions of statutory interpretation, but we review the court’s denial of the petition for an abuse of discretion
State v. Pliego Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Pliego Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Sorensen 531 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Sorensen 531 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Wanna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Wanna Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
constitute an abuse of discretion.” ¶ 3 (App. 2014) (citation omitted).
State of Arizona v. Alan Ivan Ibarra 522 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Alan Ivan Ibarra 522 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
We review the court’s denial of the petition for an abuse of discretion, but “[w]e review the interpretation of statutes and court rules de novo,”
State v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Tovar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State of Arizona v. Elifonso Anthony Cruz 504 P.3d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State of Arizona v. Elifonso Anthony Cruz 504 P.3d 283 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2022
State v. Furlong 473 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Furlong 473 P.3d 707 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 2 (App. 2014); ¶ 4 n.2 (App. 2004).
State v. Perry 428 P.3d 509 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Perry 428 P.3d 509 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
See, e.g. , State v. Nixon , , ; State v. Hall , , ¶ 2, ; State v. Key , , ; State v. Grant , , ; cf. State v. Buonafede , , 448, , 1385 (1991) (trial court had no authority, in rights restoration proceeding, to issue "certificate of rehab
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
§ 13-4033(A)(3).1 ¶ 2 (App. 2014) (citing A.R.S.
State v. Kot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Kot Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health Services 395 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health Services 395 P.3d 709 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
§ 13-907 “is a special benefit conferred by statute, [] it is naturally subject to legislative control and limitations.” ¶ 11, (citation omitted) (holding that a conviction set aside under the statue “may continue to serve as the basis for restricting a defendant’s right to bear firearms,” and noting that it likewise “may be used to enhance or aggravate future sentences,” may be used for impeachment