Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Vaughn Miles Denz, 306 P.3d 98.

72 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger 492 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2021
State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger 492 P.3d 1020 Ariz. 2021
See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687–88 (1984); ¶ 6 (App. 2013).
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. MacIas 469 P.3d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
6 ¶ 4 (2017) (–44, ¶ 6 (App. 2013)).
State v. Bolton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Bolton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“To overcome this presumption,” a petitioner must show that “counsel’s decisions were not tactical in nature, but instead were the result of ‘ineptitude, inexperience or lack of preparation.’” ¶ 7 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
" State v. Denz , , ¶ 7, quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct.
State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
State v. Denz , , ¶ 6, , 100-01 (App. 2013), citing Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687-88, 104 S.Ct.
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Furthermore, “we must presume counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance that might be considered sound trial strategy.” ¶ 7 (App. 2013), quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689.
State v. Falkenburry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Falkenburry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Furthermore, “we must presume ‘counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance’ that ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’” ¶ 7, (internal quotations and citations omitted).
State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
A. IAC Claims ¶4 Whether Pandeli’s lawyers “rendered ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law.” ¶ 6
State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
- 48, ¶ 22, -05 (App. 2013) (claims of actual innocence, versus sufficiency of evidence claims, are brought under Ariz. R. Crim.
State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
See Petty, 238 P.3d at 639; (performance and prejudice components of ineffective assistance claim present mixed questions of fact and law).
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
3 STATE v. JONES Decision of the Court 441, 444, ¶ 7, (citations omitted); see also Ariz. R. Evid.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by