Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Vaughn Miles Denz, 306 P.3d 98.

66 citing documents.

  • State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • State v. Varela 425 P.3d 267 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    " State v. Denz , , ¶ 7, quoting Strickland , 466 U.S. at 689 , 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • State v. Smith 422 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    State v. Denz , , ¶ 6, , 100-01 (App. 2013), citing Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687-88, 104 S.Ct.
  • State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Beasley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Furthermore, “we must presume counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance that might be considered sound trial strategy.” ¶ 7 (App. 2013), quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689.
  • State v. Falkenburry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Falkenburry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    Furthermore, “we must presume ‘counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance’ that ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’” ¶ 7, (internal quotations and citations omitted).
  • State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
  • State of Arizona v. Darrel Peter Pandeli 394 P.3d 2 Ariz. 2017
    A. IAC Claims ¶4 Whether Pandeli’s lawyers “rendered ineffective assistance is a mixed question of fact and law.” ¶ 6
  • State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Cuevas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    - 48, ¶ 22, -05 (App. 2013) (claims of actual innocence, versus sufficiency of evidence claims, are brought under Ariz. R. Crim.
  • State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
    See Petty, 238 P.3d at 639; (performance and prejudice components of ineffective assistance claim present mixed questions of fact and law).
  • State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    3 STATE v. JONES Decision of the Court 441, 444, ¶ 7, (citations omitted); see also Ariz. R. Evid.