Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Leyva, 389 P.3d 1266.
- State v. Calvillo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
State v. Calvillo
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 13 (App. 2017) (“[A] challenge to plea proceedings is subject to summary dismissal when based on ‘conclusory allegations unsupported by specifics’ or on ‘contentions that in the face of the record are wholly incredible.’”) (quoting Blacklege v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977)).
- State v. Offutt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Offutt
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
3 STATE v. OFFUTT Decision of the Court ¶7 By entering a guilty plea, Offutt waived “all non- jurisdictional defects and defenses, including claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, except those that relate to the validity of [his] plea.” ¶ 18 (App. 2017) (citation and internal quotation omitted).
- State v. Andrich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
-
State v. Andrich
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
¶ 18 (App. 2017) (internal quotation omitted).2 ¶12 Because Andrich does not contest that he had the mental capacity to knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily enter the plea, we do 2 In any event, beyond conclusory allegations, Andrich fails to show how the various information and documents he a