DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sands, 700 P.2d 1369.

27 citing documents.

  • State v. Ortiz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
    See, (victims’ testimony that defendant’s firing gun caused them “fear that another shot might injure them” was evidence of reasonable apprehension of imminent physical injury).
  • State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
  • State of Arizona v. Jamonte Lawrence Olague 381 P.3d 269 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
    (hereinafter Hagen), ¶¶ 12-13, -24, -98 (1976); -80, -54 (App. 1975); (“vague allegations of ‘dictatorial means’ tainting the deliberations” held not to be misconduct).
  • State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
    See, e.g., Roylston, 135 Ariz. at 272, 660 P.2d at 873; -77, -77 (App. 1985).
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Campbell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    When the trial court makes an “inadvertent error in the sentencing minute entry[,] [it] must be corrected.” (holding that “when there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement of sentence and the minute entry,” it may be resolved by referring to the record).
  • State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
  • State v. Vandever 119 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
    (“An inadvertent error in [a] sentencing minute entry must be corrected”).
  • State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State Ex Rel. Bowers v. Superior Court 839 P.2d 454 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    -41 , -28 (App.1989); see, -77 , -77 (App.1985).
  • State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
  • State v. Williams 819 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
    Simply because crimes follow one another does not make them a “spree.” , overruled on other grounds, , , (multiple felonies committed against police during hostage/barricade situation).
  • State v. Dawson 792 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Dawson 792 P.2d 741 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
    (improper admission of privileged testimony was harmless error when the evidence was “not critical” to the state’s case).
  • State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Crawford 767 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Crawford 767 P.2d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
    After taking the matter under advisement, the superior court judge granted the motion to dismiss the special action, stating: “ , the Court finds that the granting of Defendant’s motion to strike allegation of prior conviction and subsequent sentencing of Defendant as a nonrepetitive D.W.I.
  • State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Olsen 760 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
    -78 , -78 (App.1985) (trial court required by law to treat offense as repetitive under A.R.S.
  • State v. Henry 734 P.2d 93 Ariz. 1987
  • State v. Henry 734 P.2d 93 Ariz. 1987
  • USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • USLife Title Co. of Arizona v. Gutkin 732 P.2d 579 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    Johnson, 126 Ariz. at 226 , 613 P.2d at 1282 .
  • State v. Long 714 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Long 714 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
    See generally United States v. Mesa, 638 F.2d 582 (3d Cir.1980); United States v. Webb, 755 F.2d 382 (5th Cir.1985)