Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Woody, 845 P.2d 487.

66 citing documents.

State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
State v. Sizemore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Sizemore Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Plaza-Uzeta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Marinakis Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Evidence of a previous crime is only admissible if it is “similar to the act for which the defendant is on trial.”
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Longhini Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Castaneda 517 P.3d 53 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
A superior court abuses its discretion if its ruling “is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” ().
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Rogers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Matthews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Matthews Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Bellino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Bellino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
2 STATE v. BELLINO Decision of the Court An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion [that] is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” ().
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Nye Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“’Abuse of discretion’ has been defined as an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” ().
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Gray Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. McEvoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. McEvoy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” ().
State v. Ping Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Ping Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
“Abuse of discretion is ‘an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.’” ¶ 11 (App. 2007) ().
State v. Normann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Normann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
¶ 6 (App. 2013) (prior threats admissible to establish intent or absence of accident in second- 5 STATE v. NORMANN Decision of the Court degree murder prosecution); (prior conviction admissible to establish reckless mental state); (prior abuse admissible to establish reckless mental state).
State v. Agboghidi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Agboghidi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Salerno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Cordova Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Cordova Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.”
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Noguero v. American Family Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.”
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hicks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
An abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.”
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Havatone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
An abuse of discretion is defined as “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Holmes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Abuse of discretion is “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.”
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc. 334 P.3d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Creasey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Creasey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“„Abuse of discretion‟ has been defined as an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” (citation omitted).
Earl v. Hon. garcia/state 324 P.3d 863 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014