Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Rosengren, 14 P.3d 303.

109 citing documents.

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Arizona Elec. Power Co-Op., Inc. 83 P.3d 573 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
¶ 26 , ("This court, of course, may not disregard or deviate from controlling decisions of our supreme court.").
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Whether Rodriguez qualified as such was a finding of fact for the trial court to make, and “[w]e defer to the trial court’s factual findings that are supported by the record and not clearly erroneous.”
State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. O'DELL 46 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
¶ 8 “Generally, a trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss the indictment or to suppress evidence will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion.”
State v. Korovkin 47 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Korovkin 47 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
(in reviewing trial court’s ruling on motion to dismiss, appellate court defers to trial court’s findings of fact that are supported by the record and not clearly erroneous).
Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning 33 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning 33 P.3d 1166 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001