Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Rowland v. Great States Insurance, 20 P.3d 1158.

68 citing documents.

WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
WAGNER v. ARIZONA MUNICIPAL Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Co., ¶ 8 (App. 2001), as corrected (May 24, 2001), and in the context of workers’ compensation coverage more specifically, id.
Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Gipson v. Shinnink Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Co., ¶ 31 (App. 2001) (citing cases).
cannon/hunger v. Hon. julian/turpen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
cannon/hunger v. Hon. julian/turpen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Co., ¶ 6 n.1 (App. 2001).
Avitia v. Crisis Preparation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Avitia v. Crisis Preparation Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Hkb, Inc. v. Imperial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hkb, Inc. v. Imperial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Koskovich v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Koskovich v. Scottsdale Healthcare Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sakthiveil v. Clear Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sakthiveil v. Clear Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Vacc v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Vacc v. Chicago Title Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hoeveler v. Az Dermatology Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Hoeveler v. Az Dermatology Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
McDivitt v. Geico Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Sp Syntax v. Federal Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Delicious v. Bbva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Delicious v. Bbva Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Stebbins v. Sullivan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Co., ¶ 31, (citations omitted).
Rzendzian v. M&I Marshall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rzendzian v. M&I Marshall Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Co., n.7, ¶ 32, n.7 (App. 2001) (observing that a trial court could not consider hardship as a factor for determining attorneys’ fees because the party asserting hardship provided no evidence of it).
McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McQuality v. Martin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Johnson v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Johnson v. Cameron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative 314 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Parker, Springer Jr., Anderson v. Committee for Sustainable Retirement in Support of Initiative 314 P.3d 100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC. 274 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Hall v. READ DEVELOPMENT, INC. 274 P.3d 1211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Co., ¶ 31 , (recognizing that under § 12-341.01, we view the record in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s decision).
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C. 261 P.3d 784 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., ¶ 31 , (citations omitted).
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VICARI v. Lake Havasu City 213 P.3d 367 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
James Colt Jones v. Cochise County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., but we find the County’s argument unpersuasive.
Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 169 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Odom v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 169 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007