Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg, 156 P.3d 1149.

189 citing documents.

Followed Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9
Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp. 335 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp. 335 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLING 332 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLING 332 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
to apply estoppel for an abuse of discretion.” Flying Diamond Airpark
Washington v. Pellerito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Washington v. Pellerito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Flood Control v. Abc Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Flood Control v. Abc Sand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
An abuse of discretion encompasses incorrect legal rulings or conclusions, see Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, but without a more detailed ruling neither we nor the superior court can meaningfully review the Board’s legal conclusions de novo, as we do not know what, if any, legal conclusions it reached.
Brocki v. Brocki Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Brocki v. Brocki Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, ).
Rash v. Town of Mammoth 315 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rash v. Town of Mammoth 315 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Walsh v. Walsh 286 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Walsh v. Walsh 286 P.3d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’ ” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 , (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
Duckstein v. Wolf 282 P.3d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Duckstein v. Wolf 282 P.3d 428 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
“A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’ ” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 , (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Powers v. GUARANTY RV, INC. 278 P.3d 333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9
McBride v. KIECKHEFER ASSOCIATES, INC. 265 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
McBride v. KIECKHEFER ASSOCIATES, INC. 265 P.3d 1061 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9 , ¶ 27
Sholes v. Fernando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sholes v. Fernando 268 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sholes v. Fernando Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Sholes v. Fernando 268 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
IB Property Holdings, LLC v. Rancho Del Mar Apartments Ltd. Partnership 263 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
IB Property Holdings, LLC v. Rancho Del Mar Apartments Ltd. Partnership 263 P.3d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Romer-Pollis v. Ada 222 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Romer-Pollis v. Ada 222 P.3d 916 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
A court abuses its discretion when “it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a con *303 elusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court's finding.’ ” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 , (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
VERMA v. Stuhr 221 P.3d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 28
COUNTY OF COCHISE v. SEBASTIAO FARIA and MARIA FARI Dba FARIA DAIRY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
COUNTY OF COCHISE v. SEBASTIAO FARIA and MARIA FARI Dba FARIA DAIRY Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Lowe v. Pima County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Co., -56, -29 (1982); cf. Flying Diamond Airpark, (trial court’s decision not to apply estoppel reviewed for abuse of discretion).
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
See Flying Diamond Airpark, (“We review a trial court’s decision not to apply [equitable] estoppel for an abuse of discretion.”); ¶¶ 4, 5, (trial court’s determination of injunctive relief and application of laches reviewed for abus

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by