Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLYING DIAMOND AIRPACK, LLC v. Meienberg, 156 P.3d 1149.

185 citing documents.

  • Alvarado v. Alvarado Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    "A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion[.]" ¶ 9 (App. 2012) (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007)).
  • Brooke M. v. Timothy S., W.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Brooke M. v. Timothy S., W.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Backus v. Backus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • Backus v. Backus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶15 Because the amended decree contains legal errors, the family court erred by denying Husband’s motion for clarification/motion for new trial.3 See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007) (holding a trial court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law).
  • Sammons v. Keaggy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Sammons v. Keaggy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    .”), including whether the record provides substantial evidence supporting the determination, see Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (citation omitted).
  • State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Fischer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    -56 (1982); Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27 (App. 2007).
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • First Financial Bank, N.A. v. Claassen 357 P.3d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    4 FIRST FINANCIAL v. CLAASSEN Opinion of the Court Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Chandler v. Ellington Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (citation omitted).
  • Antonson v. Red Mtn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Antonson v. Red Mtn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • State v. Kuzmanov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Kuzmanov Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Ledo v. Ledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Ledo v. Ledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or ‘the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.’” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (quoting Grant v. Ariz. Pub.
  • Garcia v. A-Plus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin 348 P.3d 897 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • Garcia v. A-Plus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    ry conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying 5 GARCIA v. A-PLUS et al. Decision of the Court Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (citation omitted and internal quotation marks omitted).
  • Schickner v. Schickner 348 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Schickner v. Schickner 348 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (internal quotation omitted).
  • Desert Gardens v. Town of Quartzsite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Desert Gardens v. Town of Quartzsite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Winckler v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Winckler v. Bnsf Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Eastman v. Eastman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Demaree v. Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Demaree v. Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (“We review a trial court’s decision not to apply estoppel for an abuse of discretion.”).
  • Iuliano v. Wloch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Iuliano v. Wloch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    (quoting Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, ).
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Fine Point v. Occidental Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • Fine Point v. Occidental Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    “A court abuses its discretion if it commits an error of law in reaching a discretionary conclusion, it reaches a conclusion without considering the evidence, it commits some other substantial error of law, or the record fails to provide substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding.” Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27, (internal citation and quotation omitted).
  • Swett v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Vogue v. Maleknia Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • commerce/cra v. Zinke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • commerce/cra v. Zinke Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Van Leeuwen v. Van Leeuwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Van Leeuwen v. Van Leeuwen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    3 VAN LEEUWEN v. VAN LEEUWEN Decision of the Court Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Followed Kennedy Johnson v. Payne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 9
  • Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp. 335 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Gries v. Plaza Del Rio Management Corp. 335 P.3d 530 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    See Flying Diamond Airpark, ¶ 27
  • DON C. ROBERTSON v. ROBERT E. ALLING and JACQUELINE R. ALLING 332 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014